George Zimmerman Trial Livestream

Monday, March 31, 2008

FBI SAYS DOCS IN TIMES STORY LOOK FAKE: Plus, Afeni Shakur's TASF releases statement in the wake of discredited article.



FBI reports referenced in a recent Los Angeles Times story linking associates of Sean "Diddy" Combs to a 1994 attack on rapper Tupac Shakur appear to be fakes, the agency said Friday.

James Sabatino, a convicted con man in federal prison sentence for fraud, filed the documents last fall in Miami federal court as part of a $19 million lawsuit against Combs, claiming Combs never paid him for arranging a recording and video session by the late Notorious B.I.G.

The documents were said to be an FBI agent's reports on interviews conducted in 2002 of confidential informants linking Sabatino and associates of Combs to the 1994 shooting of Shakur in New York City.

"We have no record of these documents in our system," Agent Stephen Kodak told the Associated Press. "They don't appear to be legitimate."

Howard L. Weitzman, Combs' attorney, said his client and Sabatino never had a business relationship. "It should be clear that Mr. Sabatino has a vivid imagination, to say the least, and his credibility quotient is zero," Weitzman said in an e-mail.

Sabatino, 31, is currently serving an 11-year sentence for identity theft and fraud at a federal prison in Pennsylvania. His father once said in a letter to a judge that his son "is a disturbed young man who needed attention like a drug."


Meanwhile, a statement was released over the weekend from the Tupac Amaru Shakur Foundation containing what it says is a response from the late rapper's mother, Afeni Shakur, to the Los Angeles Times article.


"We will continue to work to save the lives of our young people and to offer peaceful alternatives to violence and conflict resolution," the statement quotes Afeni Shakur as saying. "That is what we have done since the murder of my son, and that is exactly what we will consciously continue to do."

Where Should Nation's Dialogue on Race Begin?



By: Adam Geller, AP National Writer

So, we're going to get honest about race this time? Let's get started then. If only it were that simple.

We've had time to digest Sen. Barack Obama's call for a new, and more frank, examination of the "complexities of race in this country that we've never really worked our way through." Plenty of people, including some from opposite sides of the ideological fence, heard something in that speech that spoke to their hearts.

But a period of reflection makes clear that, when the power of rhetoric fades, we're conflicted not just about race, but even how to talk about it.

Candor can help, some say; others worry fresh honesty will inflame old tensions. And who is qualified to join in this conversation? It depends whom you ask. Is this only a black-white thing, or is that too limited? Can different generations, with different experiences, hear each other on this issue?

To some it sounds like a conversation -- or an argument -- they've been having or hearing all their lives, and one that started long before.

We live by a Constitution that began, "We the People," but declared black slaves worth only three-fifths as much as whites. From the Lincoln-Douglas faceoffs of 1858, which focused largely on what to do about slavery, to the most recent debate over renewing the Voting Rights Act, the rift over race and what to do about it has defined us.

"In some ways, he (Obama) is joining in a conversation already in progress," says Kareem Crayton, a professor of law and politics at the University of Southern California.

It's been a decade, in fact, since we set out to have the last national conversation on race. Consider where we are as we wonder how to embark on the next one.

Now is the time to wrestle with race again, says John Hope Franklin, the historian named by President Bill Clinton to lead the last effort.

Yes, says Ward Connerly, an activist who faulted the Franklin panel and has long pushed to end race-based affirmative action, it's time for Americans to level with themselves and each other about race and the legacy our attitudes have created.

So, these past antagonists agree now? Only on the desirability of introspection. They still sharply disagree on how to wrangle with the issue that has vexed the United States since even before it was established.

To many, the conversation on race is one we've never really invested with enough candor or willingness to listen.

That's clear to Jill Williams, former executive director of the Greensboro, N.C., Truth and Reconciliation Commission, formed to review the decades-old killing of five activists by the Klan.

In New York now, Williams says people hear about her experience and marvel that "racism remains so deeply ingrained in the South, and I say, 'Oh I think it's very much present here in New York,' and they look at me with shock."

Others say we need to have a conversation, but that focusing just on race, or only on tensions between blacks and whites, would be too simplistic and too divisive.

"The first thing we think about is color and that seems to negate anything else," says Rodney Cooper, a professor at the Charlotte, N.C., campus of Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary who previously worked across race lines in the men's evangelical group Promise Keepers.

"Let's talk about who's going to be talking about what."

The Obama speech didn't come close to answering that question. But it still gave people plenty to think about, with a poll by The Wall Street Journal and NBC News finding the public divided on whether Obama had said enough to explain his own feelings on race. The speech quickly became the most discussed video on YouTube, viewed more than 2 million times in less than 48 hours.

But, framed by their experiences, people took away very different things and offered responses that had clearly been percolating for some time.

Jay Love, a state legislator in Alabama, opposed a resolution last year apologizing for slavery because he disagreed with "apologizing for something that I didn't have a part of." Love is white and from Montgomery, a civil rights battleground. Growing up, race and it's connection to political power were always part of the conversation, he says.

But unlike his parents, raised in a segregated world, Love says by the time he reached school, the student body was nearly evenly split between whites and blacks. His generation and the one that has followed are dealing with each other across race every day, and to begin a new round of highly charged debate about the past will not help move those relationships forward, he says.

"I think that we've discussed it too much, to tell you the truth," says Love, now running for Congress. "If we have this conversation, what gets accomplished? That's what I want to know. To what end?"

It's necessary medicine, people like Williams respond.

The commission she led in Greensboro was formed by citizens to take a new look at what happened in 1979 when five organizers of an anti-Ku Klux Klan rally were killed by Klansmen and Nazi sympathizers. Some put part of the blame on the city police department, which chose not to patrol the rally. The new reconciliation group sought city backing, but the city council split along racial lines. Despite that, it compiled an extensive report.

Such scrutiny, even when it exposes festering tensions, has value, Williams says. But she doubts a broad national discussion will do the same.

"A generic dialogue on race isn't going to do it," she says. "We have gotten to the point where we know the right things to say, the wrong things to say... Where we're going to do something is if we talk about specific events," like the Greensboro rally.

At 93, Franklin has witnessed plenty of such events. Everyday details of racism that defined his Tulsa boyhood remain vivid: he recalls, for example, how he wanted to go to an opera house where blacks were not allowed, save for a single section with almost no view of the stage. "We've almost come to a position," he says, "where at least I can live like a human being without climbing up some back step."

But the incremental change only proves the value of the conversation we've long been having and the need to keep having it, he says.

Reflecting on Clinton's race panel, which was derided by critics, Franklin says, "It was clear to me that we couldn't get very far and we didn't get very far and I was very much distressed over the way in which the country reacted to what we were trying to do.

"I think this is a better time."

The irony is that he and Connerly find a bit of agreement there.

Connerly is known chiefly for his push to remove race-based preferences in California university admissions, hiring and contracts. He sounds almost a little surprised to find that Obama's speech plucked such an internal chord.

For him, though, it's an invitation to self-examination. A broad conversation might ignore the fact that the American life today is much more complex than divisions between two races, he says. He wonders how we'd structure the conversation, or who'd be part of it.

Still, Connerly, who is black, says the value of personal honesty is that it might move people, particularly blacks, forward rather than looking back.

"There are a lot of black people who are angry and black people have to get beyond that. You can't walk around with anger for the rest of your lives. As a country we have to deal with that," he says.

Author Tom Wolfe, who described the contortions of people trying to reconcile themselves with race in books like "Radical Chic" and "Bonfire of the Vanities," sees it differently. A national conversation might work, he says, if the premise is to find ways to bring people into harmony.

"But if it's candor we're talking about, that's not so great," says Wolfe, who is white. "Candor is a form of madness and it's an ever-failing source of ill-will for everybody from husbands and wives to nations. Don't try it."

Chang-Rae Lee, author of books including "Native Speaker," that examine the lives of Korean-Americans as societal outsiders, backs a wide-ranging discussion of race, but has a different worry.

"Part of me fears such discussions might get hijacked (like everything else) by demagogues and race-baiters for their own purposes, and actually cause greater harm," Lee says in an e-mail.

Cooper, a black professor at an overwhelmingly white seminary, believes the solution may be in how we direct ourselves. In Promise Keepers, members consistently reminded themselves of the faith connecting them, even when race might have divided.

"Let's talk about what we have in common, common values, rather than what makes us different," he says.

Time, though, has shown it's not easy to begin that conversation.

Hours after Obama spoke, a white man and a black man sat across from each other, trying to pick through the minefield of prejudices in a search for common ground -- and a few laughs.

"Okay, car stereos," said the white guy, comedian Jon Stewart. "A lot of times when you guys are driving down the street, it's really loud. And we hate that."

The black guy, comedian Larry Wilmore, turned to the anger he feels when distrustful storekeepers watch him like a suspect. He'd worked too hard to be treated this way.

"We've all had to work, Larry!" a mock-indignant Stewart replied. "My family came to this country with nothing. They worked in factories. They worked as taxi drivers."

"Oh, you mean when your ancestors CHOSE to come here!" Wilmore retorted.

The audience emitted a giant "Ohhhhhhhh," and, for one pregnant moment, turned quiet.

"You know," Stewart offered, as if the thought just occurred to him, "maybe it's hard to see the world from a different experience from your own."

It made for a decent punchline. But it worked as comedy because it turned on a bit of truth: Trying to have a conversation about race can be downright painful.

Tuesday, March 25, 2008

Bush: Our 4,000 Iraq War Deaths Not in Vain



By: Ben Feller, Associated Press

WASHINGTON - (AP) President Bush pledged Monday to ensure "an outcome that will merit the sacrifice" of those who have died in Iraq, offering both sympathy and resolve as the U.S. death toll in the five-year war hit 4,000.

"One day, people will look back at this moment in history and say, 'Thank God there were courageous people willing to serve because they laid the foundation for peace for generations to come,' " Bush said at the State Department after a two-hour briefing on U.S. diplomatic strategy around the world. "I vow so long as I am president to make sure that those lives were not lost in vain."

The president received another two-hour briefing earlier Monday at the White House on Iraq, this one from Gen. David Petraeus, the top commander in Iraq, and Ryan Crocker, the U.S. ambassador to Iraq, via secure video hookup from Baghdad. Petraeus and Crocker are due to testify on Capitol Hill on April 8-9.

Grim milestones such as the 4,000-mark in the war's death toll or even large clusters of casualties usually go unremarked upon by Bush. But he chose on this occasion to note the losses, albeit briefly and without taking questions from reporters.

"On this day of reflection, I offer our deepest sympathies to their families," the president said. "I hope their families know that citizens pray for their comfort and their strength, whether they were the first one who lost their life in Iraq or recently lost their life in Iraq."

The White House said Bush is likely to embrace an expected recommendation from Petraeus for a halt in troop withdrawals beyond those already scheduled to be completed by July, with the expectation that reductions would resume before the president leaves office in January. Bush also is to receive a briefing on Wednesday at the Pentagon "on what actions his advisers recommend for cementing those gains and taking action that will lay the foundation for further additional troop drawdowns," White House press secretary Dana Perino said.

Petreaus believes a so-called pause in drawdowns, lasting a month or two, is needed to assess the impact of the current round.

Perino said that Bush sees "some merit" in that idea. "I think that's not unlikely," she said. She said Bush is under "no deadline" to make a decision about troop levels before leaving next week for a NATO summit in Romania.

Bush himself has hinted in recent speeches that he supports Petraeus' position. But he did not tip his hand at all during his remarks Monday.

"Our strategy going forward will be aimed at making sure that we achieve victory and therefore America becomes more secure," he said, adding that it is important that these "young democracies survive" as the 21st century progresses.

With the war entering its sixth year, Bush has been making the argument that defeating extremists in Iraq makes it less likely that Americans will encounter enemies at home. Iraq has taken a heavy toll on his presidency, contributing to Bush's low poll ratings.

The U.S. has about 158,000 troops in Iraq. That number is expected to drop to 140,000 by summer in drawdowns meant to erase all but about 8,000 troops from last year's increase, widely referred to in official Washington circles as a "surge."

Perino had said earlier Monday that Bush spends time every day thinking about those who have lost their lives in battle and has "grieved for every lost American life." Families of the fallen soldiers often tell the president that they want him to complete the mission in Iraq, she said.

"He bears the responsibility for the decisions that he made," Perino said. "He also bears the responsibility to continue to focus on succeeding."

Vice President Dick Cheney, in Jerusalem to push the Mideast peace process, said the 4,000th American death in Iraq may have a psychological impact on the American public.

"You regret every casualty, every loss," he said. "The president is the one that has to make that decision to send young men and women into harm's way. It never gets any easier."

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Americans are asking how much longer their troops must sacrifice for an Iraqi government "that is unwilling or unable to secure its own future."

"Americans also understand that the cost of the war to our national security, military readiness and our reputation around the world is immense and that the threat to our economy -- as the war in Iraq continues to take us deeper into debt -- is unacceptable," Pelosi said.

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, vying for the Democratic presidential nomination, told a campaign audience in Pennsylvania that she would honor the fallen by ending the war and bringing home U.S. troops "as quickly and responsibly as possible." Her rival for the nomination, Sen. Barack Obama, said "It is past time to end this war that should never have been waged by bringing our troops home, and finally pushing Iraq's leaders to take responsibility for their future."

Group Helps Gang Members Change Their Lives



By: Uls Ilnytzky, Associated Press

NEW YORK - (AP) DaJuan Hawkins spent four months in jail for assault and thought he was a "nothing" destined for a life of street crime.

Today, the 17-year-old high school senior is heading for college and writing poetry.

Bobby Marchesi hung out with a tough group of Italian boys who clashed violently with black kids at his Brooklyn high school. Now, he's a lawyer in private practice.

What transformed Hawkins and Marchesi into confident, productive and compassionate human beings, they say, is Council For Unity.

Founded as a small anti-gang group in 1975, the council now claims to reach 100,000 people of all cultures in New York, Milwaukee, San Francisco and Vermont -- and as far away as Nigeria and the Republic of Moldova.

And its mission has expanded: The Council recently published a book of student writings. It works with families and in correctional facilities. It is developing a public safety curriculum in partnership with police in Riverhead, Long Island.

The group's story begins with its founder, Bob De Sena, a one-time gang member and former English teacher at the once-troubled John Dewey High School, the same Brooklyn school Marchesi attended.

De Sena said he turned his life around because someone gave him a second chance. He wants the Council For Unity to do the same for new generations of kids from broken homes and crime-ridden neighborhoods.

The group has a 33-year history of getting gang members together to talk, based on a message that when you bring everybody together, there's nobody left to fight.

At Christopher Columbus High School in the Bronx, gang activity ceased altogether after Council classes were introduced into the curriculum, said principal Lisa Maffei Fuentes. She said her school was on the city's most dangerous list three years ago.

"They've come to respect their home site, their school," she said.

Former gangsters drive the program, taught as a course in elementary, junior and senior high schools and colleges, and offered at community centers and prisons. Kids take the lead in finding solutions to conflicts without violence. They learn communication, leadership and organizational skills.

"This is a group that saves lives everyday," said Randi Weingarten, president of the United Federation of Teachers. "Nine-six percent of the students who participate go on to attend college ... 100 percent of participants report that the Council has had a very positive impact on their lives."

The statistics are especially impressive given the group's small budget - $1.7 million a year, with support from the teacher's union, the city and its board of directors.

De Sena calls the program "an adventure in citizenship" that empowers people to take pride in their heritage and celebrate their differences.

Sean "Dino" Johnson, who heads the council's school-based initiative, spent most of his life behind bars for drug trafficking and weapons possession. He counseled prison youth at Sing-Sing, but "had no expectations of ever going home."

That changed in 2004 when he met De Sena.

"Bob told me, 'We need people like you on the outside," said Johnson, 43. "No one ever told me that people like me were needed."

He was freed weeks later after De Sena put in a good word with the parole board. The council then hired Johnson as a counselor, where he aims to be a role model.

"When they see someone who's been to hell and back, it clicks: 'If he can do it, I can do it,'" Johnson said.

Before Hawkins joined the Council, he said his life was a daily ritual of "fighting and winning" on the street. Through the Council, he channeled his leadership qualities to counsel other youth.

Hawkins was among some 20 high school students who came to hang out at the Council's cramped space in lower Manhattan on a recent afternoon. Like Hawkins, most were former gang members who have done time. But on this day they looked happy and confident, and spoke enthusiastically about their futures.

"I really thought I was nothing," said Hawkins, who is thinking of a career in entertainment after college. "I thought I had no purpose ... but Council introduced me to different things."

He sums up his feelings in a poem, his voice catching with emotion: "Before you I was a mess. Before you I couldn't care less. ... Together forever I say this fluently, Together forever Council for Unity."

Monday, March 24, 2008

Detroit mayor charged with perjury



From staff reports

DETROIT — Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick was charged Monday with perjury, obstruction of justice and other counts for allegedly lying under oath about an extramarital affair with a top aide.

Wayne County (Mich.) Prosecuting Attorney Kym Worthy announced that Kilpatrick was named in a 12-count document in connection with an investigation that began when sexually explicit text messages surfaced that appear to contradict his sworn denials of the affair.

Former chief of staff Christine Beatty, 37, who also denied under oath that she and Kilpatrick shared a romantic relationship in 2002 and 2003, was charged with perjury and obstruction of justice.

Worthy says some documents sought as part of her probe have been "lost or destroyed."

"Our investigation has led to other potential defendants, so we will continue our investigation into their activities," she says. "Let me be very, very clear: this was not an investigation focused on lying about sex."

Aides to Kilpatrick have said that the mayor plans to remain in office, regardless of Monday's decision.

The announcement follows an eight-week investigation that was prompted by a Jan. 23-24 Detroit Free Press story that revealed the existence of text messages showing that the mayor and Beatty lied at last year's police whistle-blower trial when they denied having an extramarital affair. The Free Press is owned by Gannett, the parent company of USA TODAY.

The messages also showed that they provided misleading testimony about firing former Deputy Police Chief Gary Brown in 2003 after he and former mayoral bodyguard Harold Nelthrope began asking questions about a rumored wild party at the mayoral mansion and alleged misconduct involving the mayor's security team — questions that threatened to expose the sexual affair.

Despite the false testimony, a Wayne County Circuit Court jury last September awarded Brown and Nelthrope $6.5 million in damages. Kilpatrick vowed to appeal, but on Oct. 17, abruptly decided to settle the case and a second police whistle-blower suit involving former mayoral bodyguard Walt Harris for $8.4 million — $9 million with legal costs.

Kilpatrick settled after the plaintiffs' lawyer, Mike Stefani, informed the mayor's lawyer that he had the incriminating text messages and would reveal them in court papers he planned to file to justify his request for legal fees in the whistle-blower case.

Although Kilpatrick apologized for his conduct in a televised appearance with his wife, Carlita, in late January, he has blamed the media for his troubles and rejected calls from the City Council, Attorney General Mike Cox and city union locals to resign.

Settlement documents the Free Press obtained last month through a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit against the city show that — contrary to Kilpatrick's claim that he decided to settle based on advice from friends, advisers and ordinary citizens — he made peace with the cops after discovering that Stefani had the text messages.

Although Kilpatrick's lawyers settled the suit with one agreement on Oct. 17, they decided to split it into public and private settlements after the Free Press requested a copy.

The public agreement showed how much the former cops would be paid. The secret agreement, signed by Kilpatrick and Beatty, swore Brown, Nelthrope and Stefani to secrecy about the text messages under threat of forfeiting their settlement proceeds and legal fees.

Wayne County Circuit Judge Robert Colombo Jr. released the secret agreement last month after the Kilpatrick administration repeatedly denied its existence. Colombo released the agreement and other secret settlement records after the administration appealed unsuccessfully to the Michigan Court of Appeals and state Supreme Court, which rejected Kilpatrick's claim that the documents weren't public documents.

The City Council, which was kept in the dark about Kilpatrick's reasons for settling the lawsuit and never saw the confidential side agreement, voted 7-1 last week to pass an advisory resolution calling for the mayor to resign. It also ordered an investigation of the episode and directed its auditor general to look into spending by the mayor's office and the city Law Department.

Kilpatrick went on television with his wife in late January and apologized for his conduct, he insists there was no cover-up and has blamed the news media for most of his problems. He accused the Free Press of illegally obtaining the text messages — which the newspaper denies — and accusing the media of conducting a public lynching. He said the text messages and the settlement agreement that concealed them should never have been made public.

He also said the text messages were private even though he signed a policy directive in June 2000 advising city employees that all electronic communications should be considered public.

So far, Kilpatrick has refused to step down, saying he is on a divinely inspired mission to help rebuild the city. But conviction of a felony would force him to resign.

Beatty resigned in late January.

The scandal is the latest to confront Kilpatrick, a gifted politician who became the youngest mayor in Detroit history when he was elected in 2001 after serving in the state Legislature.

But his six-year tenure as mayor has been rocky.

He has been beset by repeated controversies over extravagant spending with his city-issued credit card, lying publicly about ordering the police department to lease a Lincoln Navigator for his wife and battening down information hatches at City Hall, making it more difficult for reporters and the public to inquire about his activities.

Besides possible criminal charges, the text messaging scandal and how city-paid lawyers responded to it could result in professional misconduct charges from the Michigan Attorney Grievance Commission.

If Kilpatrick or Beatty is charged with crimes, defense lawyers are expected to attack the authenticity of the text messages, demanding that prosecutors prove Kilpatrick and Beatty sent them and that they had an affair.

Two previous Detroit mayors have been charged with felonies, both after leaving office.

Mayor Richard Reading, mayor in 1938-40, was sentenced to 4-1/2 to 5 years in prison after being charged with conspiring with 80 policemen to protect Detroit's numbers racket. Mayor Louis Miriani, mayor from 1957-62, was sentenced to one year in prison for income tax evasion after leaving office.

Contributing: Detroit Free Press; Mike Carney in McLean, Va.; Associated Press

Commentary: Want to Know Why Rev. Wright Gets Amens? Look No Further Than Men Like Pat Buchanan



By: Deborah Mathis, BlackAmericaWeb.com

If you’re still wondering why the Jeremiah Wrights of this world do not preach to empty sanctuaries where nary an “amen” can be heard when they rail against racial injustices, look no further than one Patrick J. Buchanan.

Buchanan has been on the public stage since the administration of Richard Nixon, whom Buchanan served in the White House. Since then, he has made a name for himself as a syndicated columnist, television talk show host, omnipresent political pundit, public speaker and, twice, presidential candidate -- first, as a Republican and later as the nominee of a feeble third party. His jobs may have varied, but his ideology never has. Buchanan is a rock-ribbed conservative. And a neo-racist.

Surprisingly to some, Buchanan joined the chorus of observers who congratulated Sen. Barack Obama on last week’s “race speech,” as it’s being called. The presidential candidate acquitted himself well, Buchanan said in several TV appearances.

But, it would have come as no surprise to those who know Buchanan’s underhandedness and two-faced habits that, in the same week, he had resorted to form, turning to his old hateful, separatist tricks.

Of Obama’s call for more faith and investment in civil rights and equalization of the various playing fields -- jobs, housing, criminal justice, etc. -- Buchanan wrote this in a column:

“It is the same old con, the same old shakedown that black hustlers have been running since the Kerner Commission blamed the riots in Harlem, Watts, Newark, Detroit and a hundred other cities on, as Nixon put it, “everybody but the rioters themselves.’

“Was ‘white racism’ really responsible for those black men looting auto dealerships and liquor stores, and burning down their own communities … .”

If you’ve ever seen Buchanan on the air -- and he is a fixture at MSNBC, to name but one of his many haunts -- you will know that he is a student of history or, better put, of historical facts. He can name dates of treaties, obscure opponents of nearly obscure presidents and election results with the best of them.

But Buchanan seems either incapable of or unwilling to be faithful to history and actually process or learn its lessons. Were he the student of past experiences that he fancies himself to be, he would acknowledge that words, actions and policies have consequences; that they affect conditions and circumstances, which, in turn, affect attitudes, which, in turn, affect behaviors. He would admit that, to portray the riots of the 1960s as just purely impulsive, unfounded events, detached from circumstance spawned by discriminatory -- even cruel -- policy and practice is half-witted. Failing to acknowledge that is what leaves us in, as Obama put it, the “racial stalemate.”

Compounding the offense, Buchanan ran to that old and corrupt argument about black indebtedness to whites for sparing us the degradations of the motherland or, for that matter, anywhere else on Earth.

“America has been the best country on Earth for black folks,” he wrote. “It was here that 600,000 black people, brought from Africa in slave ships, grew into a community of 40 million, were introduced to Christian salvation and reached the greatest levels of freedom and prosperity blacks have ever known.”

Rev. Wright, he said, “ought to go down on his knees and thank God he is an American.”

Then, the coup de grace: “No people anywhere has done more to lift up blacks than white Americans.” Buchanan names several domestic programs like food stamps, Pell Grants and affirmative action, all of which, in his demented view, give black Americans an unfair advantage. “Where,” he asks, “is the gratitude?”

What accounts for Buchanan’s seething anger and resentment is unclear, since he did not grow up without health care or good housing or a fine education but, indeed, seems to have enjoyed every advantage the country has to offer. I suppose, then, he is playing to his audience -- whites who blame their failures and disappointments on black Americans and other people of color.

His language toys with their anger, bats it around and fuels it -- this, from the same man who says Rev. Wright is just stirring the bad pot.

But, of course, that’s his line for the general public. He sings a different tune when talking to his base. That’s what Rev. Wright understands: The underground movement of spiteful, condescending and militant racism lives, supported by men and women of influence who pretend to be civilized while, in truth, their hearts cradle vile, savage passions, feeding on damning stereotypes so hungrily that it seems they are addicted to anger.

Talk one way; walk another. It is, you could say, the same old con.

FBI Looking at Civil Rights Charges in Death of Woman Shot by Officer While Holding Baby





By: Jackie Jones, BlackAmericaWeb.com

The FBI is looking into possible civil rights violations in the shooting death of Tarika Wilson, a black woman mortally wounded by a white police officer in Lima, Ohio while holding her infant son, who was also shot.

Sgt. Joseph Chavalia has been indicted on a misdemeanor charge of negligent homicide in the death of 26-year-old Wilson after she was shot during a SWAT raid at her house in January while police were looking for her boyfriend. Chavalia also was charged with misdemeanor negligent assault in the wounding of Wilson’s son Sincere Wilson, whose finger had to be amputated.

The NAACP chapter, ministers and other local leaders in Lima have said the charges against Chavalia should have been more serious.

Chavalia, who has pleaded not guilty to the charges, was released on $50,000 bond and faces up to eight months in jail if convicted of both charges.

According to reports, police bashed in the front door of Wilson’s home and entered with guns drawn. Neighbors who saw the raid told reporters that moments later officers opened fire, killing Wilson and wounding the 14-month-old baby, who she was holding in her arms.

Details of what happened between the time police entered the home and when gunfire erupted are unclear. Police and the prosecutor’s office have not released details of the investigation report.

Family members have said Wilson was an innocent, unarmed bystander in the incident.

Police arrested Wilson’s boyfriend, Anthony Terry, on drug charges and said they found suspected marijuana and crack cocaine in the house. He was later indicted on three counts of trafficking in crack cocaine, six counts of permitting drug abuse, and four counts of trafficking in marijuana for incidents occurring between September 2007 and Jan. 4, the day of the raid. He is scheduled to go to trial April 1, according to The (Toledo) Blade.

The Blade also reported that Chavalia had been on the Lima police force since January 1977 and was promoted to sergeant in 1990. A member of the department’s SWAT team since 1986, he wrote a comprehensive use-of-force policy for Lima police in 1990, the newspaper said.

The Rev. Jesse Jackson visited Lima in February and met with Lima and Allen County officials. In a news conference after the meeting, he called for charges against Lima police in the incident, saying they used unnecessary and illegal force.

“There must be a deterrent, not just for the man who pulled the trigger, but for those who planned [the raid],” Jackson told reporters.

Mayor David Berger said at the time that while he welcomed Jackson’s visit, he thought the comments about the shooting were divisive and heightened tensions.

“It’s inappropriate and unjustified. He doesn’t have all the facts to make that kind of judgment,” the mayor told The Blade.

Jackson also visited Lima Senior High School to deliver a message of hope to students and met with local clergy and community leaders during the visit.

The grand jury indictments against Chavalia were announced last Monday. He has been suspended with pay pending the conclusion of the case.

Rev. C.M. Manley, pastor of New Morning Star Missionary Baptist Church, said last week that a major protest rally was being planned, but no date had been set.

Several smaller protests had been held weekly after the Jan. 4 shooting and many black residents testified at a forum about the shootings led by the Ohio attorney general about what they called abuse at the hands of local police and inequities in the justice system.

Organizers hope a larger rally will result in substantive change.

“We haven’t set a date yet, but we’re going to protest,” Manley told BlackAmericaWeb.com. “We’re very disturbed about that because it’s not right. The NAACP and the black ministers are getting together. White people are supporting us, too. They all see this isn’t right.”

Manley said there had been a long history of racial tensions between the black community in Lima, the police and the prosecutor’s office.

“There always has been with young black men,” Manley said. “Almost every young black man in our town has been to prison. You know how they do, the whites get off and the blacks go to prison for things you should get probation on.”

Jason Upthegrove, president of the Lima NAACP, said the chapter asked the FBI to investigate and determine whether the case was handled fairly.

"Any time a man shoots through a baby and kills an unarmed woman, and is charged with two misdemeanors, I think it would be an understatement to say that that's unacceptable," he said. "I think it says a lot about the judicial system here in our county, it says a lot about the grand jury."

In addition to her injured son, Wilson is survived by five other children, aged eight and under.

Thursday, March 20, 2008

CITY COUNCIL WANTS KWAME KILPATRICK TO RESIGN: Vote goes 7-1 in favor of his removal; Mayor says it's irrelevant.



The Detroit City Council voted Tuesday to call for Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick’s resignation in the wake of his embarrassing text-message scandal.


According to the Detroit Free Press, the vote was 7-1 in favor of urging the politician to step down.

Kilpatrick has dismissed the nonbinding resolution as irrelevant and vowed not to resign, according to the newspaper. A last-minute change to the resolution struck language calling for the council’s independent attorney, Bill Goodman to “explore the proceedings by which the mayor may be removed from office” if Kilpatrick stands by his promise to stay in office.

The resolution cites 33 reasons for Kilpatrick to quit, including failing to inform the council of a secret deal the mayor made to settle a whistleblower lawsuit and an accusation that he “repeatedly obfuscates the truth.” It also claims his administration has failed to govern effectively, noting widespread street light outages and mandatory audits getting turned in late.

It also says: “There is an overwhelming and growing sentiment amongst citizens of Detroit that the City Council should stand firm against Mayor Kilpatrick and seek his resignation.”

Responding to the resolution during an appearance at Wayne County Community College's east-side campus, Kilpatrick told reporters: "My reaction is, OK, now since it's over, it has no effect, it's not binding, let's get back to work."

Wednesday, March 19, 2008

TEXT OF BARACK OBAMA'S SPEECH ON RACE: Delivered on March 18, 2008 in Philadelphia, PA.


"We the people, in order to form a more perfect union."


Two hundred and twenty one years ago, in a hall that still stands across the street, a group of men gathered and, with these simple words, launched America's improbable experiment in democracy. Farmers and scholars; statesmen and patriots who had traveled across an ocean to escape tyranny and persecution finally made real their declaration of independence at a Philadelphia convention that lasted through the spring of 1787.


The document they produced was eventually signed but ultimately unfinished. It was stained by this nation's original sin of slavery, a question that divided the colonies and brought the convention to a stalemate until the founders chose to allow the slave trade to continue for at least twenty more years, and to leave any final resolution to future generations.


Of course, the answer to the slavery question was already embedded within our Constitution - a Constitution that had at is very core the ideal of equal citizenship under the law; a Constitution that promised its people liberty, and justice, and a union that could be and should be perfected over time.


And yet words on a parchment would not be enough to deliver slaves from bondage, or provide men and women of every color and creed their full rights and obligations as citizens of the United States. What would be needed were Americans in successive generations who were willing to do their part - through protests and struggle, on the streets and in the courts, through a civil war and civil disobedience and always at great risk - to narrow that gap between the promise of our ideals and the reality of their time.


This was one of the tasks we set forth at the beginning of this campaign - to continue the long march of those who came before us, a march for a more just, more equal, more free, more caring and more prosperous America. I chose to run for the presidency at this moment in history because I believe deeply that we cannot solve the challenges of our time unless we solve them together - unless we perfect our union by understanding that we may have different stories, but we hold common hopes; that we may not look the same and we may not have come from the same place, but we all want to move in the same direction - towards a better future for of children and our grandchildren.


This belief comes from my unyielding faith in the decency and generosity of the American people. But it also comes from my own American story.


I am the son of a black man from Kenya and a white woman from Kansas. I was raised with the help of a white grandfather who survived a Depression to serve in Patton's Army during World War II and a white grandmother who worked on a bomber assembly line at Fort Leavenworth while he was overseas. I've gone to some of the best schools in America and lived in one of the world's poorest nations. I am married to a black American who carries within her the blood of slaves and slaveowners - an inheritance we pass on to our two precious daughters. I have brothers, sisters, nieces, nephews, uncles and cousins, of every race and every hue, scattered across three continents, and for as long as I live, I will never forget that in no other country on Earth is my story even possible.


It's a story that hasn't made me the most conventional candidate. But it is a story that has seared into my genetic makeup the idea that this nation is more than the sum of its parts - that out of many, we are truly one.


Throughout the first year of this campaign, against all predictions to the contrary, we saw how hungry the American people were for this message of unity. Despite the temptation to view my candidacy through a purely racial lens, we won commanding victories in states with some of the whitest populations in the country. In South Carolina, where the Confederate Flag still flies, we built a powerful coalition of African Americans and white Americans.


This is not to say that race has not been an issue in the campaign. At various stages in the campaign, some commentators have deemed me either "too black" or "not black enough." We saw racial tensions bubble to the surface during the week before the South Carolina primary. The press has scoured every exit poll for the latest evidence of racial polarization, not just in terms of white and black, but black and brown as well.


And yet, it has only been in the last couple of weeks that the discussion of race in this campaign has taken a particularly divisive turn.


On one end of the spectrum, we've heard the implication that my candidacy is somehow an exercise in affirmative action; that it's based solely on the desire of wide-eyed liberals to purchase racial reconciliation on the cheap. On the other end, we've heard my former pastor, Reverend Jeremiah Wright, use incendiary language to express views that have the potential not only to widen the racial divide, but views that denigrate both the greatness and the goodness of our nation; that rightly offend white and black alike.


I have already condemned, in unequivocal terms, the statements of Reverend Wright that have caused such controversy. For some, nagging questions remain. Did I know him to be an occasionally fierce critic of American domestic and foreign policy? Of course. Did I ever hear him make remarks that could be considered controversial while I sat in church? Yes. Did I strongly disagree with many of his political views? Absolutely - just as I'm sure many of you have heard remarks from your pastors, priests, or rabbis with which you strongly disagreed.


But the remarks that have caused this recent firestorm weren't simply controversial. They weren't simply a religious leader's effort to speak out against perceived injustice. Instead, they expressed a profoundly distorted view of this country - a view that sees white racism as endemic, and that elevates what is wrong with America above all that we know is right with America; a view that sees the conflicts in the Middle East as rooted primarily in the actions of stalwart allies like Israel, instead of emanating from the perverse and hateful ideologies of radical Islam.


As such, Reverend Wright's comments were not only wrong but divisive, divisive at a time when we need unity; racially charged at a time when we need to come together to solve a set of monumental problems - two wars, a terrorist threat, a falling economy, a chronic health care crisis and potentially devastating climate change; problems that are neither black or white or Latino or Asian, but rather problems that confront us all.


Given my background, my politics, and my professed values and ideals, there will no doubt be those for whom my statements of condemnation are not enough. Why associate myself with Reverend Wright in the first place, they may ask? Why not join another church? And I confess that if all that I knew of Reverend Wright were the snippets of those sermons that have run in an endless loop on the television and You Tube, or if Trinity United Church of Christ conformed to the caricatures being peddled by some commentators, there is no doubt that I would react in much the same way


But the truth is, that isn't all that I know of the man. The man I met more than twenty years ago is a man who helped introduce me to my Christian faith, a man who spoke to me about our obligations to love one another; to care for the sick and lift up the poor. He is a man who served his country as a U.S. Marine; who has studied and lectured at some of the finest universities and seminaries in the country, and who for over thirty years led a church that serves the community by doing God's work here on Earth - by housing the homeless, ministering to the needy, providing day care services and scholarships and prison ministries, and reaching out to those suffering from HIV/AIDS.


In my first book, Dreams From My Father, I described the experience of my first service at Trinity:


"People began to shout, to rise from their seats and clap and cry out, a forceful wind carrying the reverend's voice up into the rafters....And in that single note - hope! - I heard something else; at the foot of that cross, inside the thousands of churches across the city, I imagined the stories of ordinary black people merging with the stories of David and Goliath, Moses and Pharaoh, the Christians in the lion's den, Ezekiel's field of dry bones. Those stories - of survival, and freedom, and hope - became our story, my story; the blood that had spilled was our blood, the tears our tears; until this black church, on this bright day, seemed once more a vessel carrying the story of a people into future generations and into a larger world. Our trials and triumphs became at once unique and universal, black and more than black; in chronicling our journey, the stories and songs gave us a means to reclaim memories that we didn't need to feel shame about...memories that all people might study and cherish - and with which we could start to rebuild."


That has been my experience at Trinity. Like other predominantly black churches across the country, Trinity embodies the black community in its entirety - the doctor and the welfare mom, the model student and the former gang-banger. Like other black churches, Trinity's services are full of raucous laughter and sometimes bawdy humor. They are full of dancing, clapping, screaming and shouting that may seem jarring to the untrained ear. The church contains in full the kindness and cruelty, the fierce intelligence and the shocking ignorance, the struggles and successes, the love and yes, the bitterness and bias that make up the black experience in America.


And this helps explain, perhaps, my relationship with Reverend Wright. As imperfect as he may be, he has been like family to me. He strengthened my faith, officiated my wedding, and baptized my children. Not once in my conversations with him have I heard him talk about any ethnic group in derogatory terms, or treat whites with whom he interacted with anything but courtesy and respect. He contains within him the contradictions - the good and the bad - of the community that he has served diligently for so many years.


I can no more disown him than I can disown the black community. I can no more disown him than I can my white grandmother - a woman who helped raise me, a woman who sacrificed again and again for me, a woman who loves me as much as she loves anything in this world, but a woman who once confessed her fear of black men who passed by her on the street, and who on more than one occasion has uttered racial or ethnic stereotypes that made me cringe.


These people are a part of me. And they are a part of America, this country that I love.


Some will see this as an attempt to justify or excuse comments that are simply inexcusable. I can assure you it is not. I suppose the politically safe thing would be to move on from this episode and just hope that it fades into the woodwork. We can dismiss Reverend Wright as a crank or a demagogue, just as some have dismissed Geraldine Ferraro, in the aftermath of her recent statements, as harboring some deep-seated racial bias.


But race is an issue that I believe this nation cannot afford to ignore right now. We would be making the same mistake that Reverend Wright made in his offending sermons about America - to simplify and stereotype and amplify the negative to the point that it distorts reality.


The fact is that the comments that have been made and the issues that have surfaced over the last few weeks reflect the complexities of race in this country that we've never really worked through - a part of our union that we have yet to perfect. And if we walk away now, if we simply retreat into our respective corners, we will never be able to come together and solve challenges like health care, or education, or the need to find good jobs for every American.


Understanding this reality requires a reminder of how we arrived at this point. As William Faulkner once wrote, "The past isn't dead and buried. In fact, it isn't even past." We do not need to recite here the history of racial injustice in this country. But we do need to remind ourselves that so many of the disparities that exist in the African-American community today can be directly traced to inequalities passed on from an earlier generation that suffered under the brutal legacy of slavery and Jim Crow.


Segregated schools were, and are, inferior schools; we still haven't fixed them, fifty years after Brown v. Board of Education, and the inferior education they provided, then and now, helps explain the pervasive achievement gap between today's black and white students.


Legalized discrimination - where blacks were prevented, often through violence, from owning property, or loans were not granted to African-American business owners, or black homeowners could not access FHA mortgages, or blacks were excluded from unions, or the police force, or fire departments - meant that black families could not amass any meaningful wealth to bequeath to future generations. That history helps explain the wealth and income gap between black and white, and the concentrated pockets of poverty that persists in so many of today's urban and rural communities.


A lack of economic opportunity among black men, and the shame and frustration that came from not being able to provide for one's family, contributed to the erosion of black families - a problem that welfare policies for many years may have worsened. And the lack of basic services in so many urban black neighborhoods - parks for kids to play in, police walking the beat, regular garbage pick-up and building code enforcement - all helped create a cycle of violence, blight and neglect that continue to haunt us.


This is the reality in which Reverend Wright and other African-Americans of his generation grew up. They came of age in the late fifties and early sixties, a time when segregation was still the law of the land and opportunity was systematically constricted. What's remarkable is not how many failed in the face of discrimination, but rather how many men and women overcame the odds; how many were able to make a way out of no way for those like me who would come after them.


But for all those who scratched and clawed their way to get a piece of the American Dream, there were many who didn't make it - those who were ultimately defeated, in one way or another, by discrimination. That legacy of defeat was passed on to future generations - those young men and increasingly young women who we see standing on street corners or languishing in our prisons, without hope or prospects for the future. Even for those blacks who did make it, questions of race, and racism, continue to define their worldview in fundamental ways. For the men and women of Reverend Wright's generation, the memories of humiliation and doubt and fear have not gone away; nor has the anger and the bitterness of those years. That anger may not get expressed in public, in front of white co-workers or white friends. But it does find voice in the barbershop or around the kitchen table. At times, that anger is exploited by politicians, to gin up votes along racial lines, or to make up for a politician's own failings.


And occasionally it finds voice in the church on Sunday morning, in the pulpit and in the pews. The fact that so many people are surprised to hear that anger in some of Reverend Wright's sermons simply reminds us of the old truism that the most segregated hour in American life occurs on Sunday morning. That anger is not always productive; indeed, all too often it distracts attention from solving real problems; it keeps us from squarely facing our own complicity in our condition, and prevents the African-American community from forging the alliances it needs to bring about real change. But the anger is real; it is powerful; and to simply wish it away, to condemn it without understanding its roots, only serves to widen the chasm of misunderstanding that exists between the races.


In fact, a similar anger exists within segments of the white community. Most working- and middle-class white Americans don't feel that they have been particularly privileged by their race. Their experience is the immigrant experience - as far as they're concerned, no one's handed them anything, they've built it from scratch. They've worked hard all their lives, many times only to see their jobs shipped overseas or their pension dumped after a lifetime of labor. They are anxious about their futures, and feel their dreams slipping away; in an era of stagnant wages and global competition, opportunity comes to be seen as a zero sum game, in which your dreams come at my expense. So when they are told to bus their children to a school across town; when they hear that an African American is getting an advantage in landing a good job or a spot in a good college because of an injustice that they themselves never committed; when they're told that their fears about crime in urban neighborhoods are somehow prejudiced, resentment builds over time.


Like the anger within the black community, these resentments aren't always expressed in polite company. But they have helped shape the political landscape for at least a generation. Anger over welfare and affirmative action helped forge the Reagan Coalition. Politicians routinely exploited fears of crime for their own electoral ends. Talk show hosts and conservative commentators built entire careers unmasking bogus claims of racism while dismissing legitimate discussions of racial injustice and inequality as mere political correctness or reverse racism.


Just as black anger often proved counterproductive, so have these white resentments distracted attention from the real culprits of the middle class squeeze - a corporate culture rife with inside dealing, questionable accounting practices, and short-term greed; a Washington dominated by lobbyists and special interests; economic policies that favor the few over the many. And yet, to wish away the resentments of white Americans, to label them as misguided or even racist, without recognizing they are grounded in legitimate concerns - this too widens the racial divide, and blocks the path to understanding.


This is where we are right now. It's a racial stalemate we've been stuck in for years. Contrary to the claims of some of my critics, black and white, I have never been so naïve as to believe that we can get beyond our racial divisions in a single election cycle, or with a single candidacy - particularly a candidacy as imperfect as my own.


But I have asserted a firm conviction - a conviction rooted in my faith in God and my faith in the American people - that working together we can move beyond some of our old racial wounds, and that in fact we have no choice is we are to continue on the path of a more perfect union.


For the African-American community, that path means embracing the burdens of our past without becoming victims of our past. It means continuing to insist on a full measure of justice in every aspect of American life. But it also means binding our particular grievances - for better health care, and better schools, and better jobs - to the larger aspirations of all Americans -- the white woman struggling to break the glass ceiling, the white man whose been laid off, the immigrant trying to feed his family. And it means taking full responsibility for own lives - by demanding more from our fathers, and spending more time with our children, and reading to them, and teaching them that while they may face challenges and discrimination in their own lives, they must never succumb to despair or cynicism; they must always believe that they can write their own destiny.


Ironically, this quintessentially American - and yes, conservative - notion of self-help found frequent expression in Reverend Wright's sermons. But what my former pastor too often failed to understand is that embarking on a program of self-help also requires a belief that society can change.


The profound mistake of Reverend Wright's sermons is not that he spoke about racism in our society. It's that he spoke as if our society was static; as if no progress has been made; as if this country - a country that has made it possible for one of his own members to run for the highest office in the land and build a coalition of white and black; Latino and Asian, rich and poor, young and old -- is still irrevocably bound to a tragic past. But what we know -- what we have seen - is that America can change. That is true genius of this nation. What we have already achieved gives us hope - the audacity to hope - for what we can and must achieve tomorrow.


In the white community, the path to a more perfect union means acknowledging that what ails the African-American community does not just exist in the minds of black people; that the legacy of discrimination - and current incidents of discrimination, while less overt than in the past - are real and must be addressed. Not just with words, but with deeds - by investing in our schools and our communities; by enforcing our civil rights laws and ensuring fairness in our criminal justice system; by providing this generation with ladders of opportunity that were unavailable for previous generations. It requires all Americans to realize that your dreams do not have to come at the expense of my dreams; that investing in the health, welfare, and education of black and brown and white children will ultimately help all of America prosper.


In the end, then, what is called for is nothing more, and nothing less, than what all the world's great religions demand - that we do unto others as we would have them do unto us. Let us be our brother's keeper, Scripture tells us. Let us be our sister's keeper. Let us find that common stake we all have in one another, and let our politics reflect that spirit as well.


For we have a choice in this country. We can accept a politics that breeds division, and conflict, and cynicism. We can tackle race only as spectacle - as we did in the OJ trial - or in the wake of tragedy, as we did in the aftermath of Katrina - or as fodder for the nightly news. We can play Reverend Wright's sermons on every channel, every day and talk about them from now until the election, and make the only question in this campaign whether or not the American people think that I somehow believe or sympathize with his most offensive words. We can pounce on some gaffe by a Hillary supporter as evidence that she's playing the race card, or we can speculate on whether white men will all flock to John McCain in the general election regardless of his policies.


We can do that.


But if we do, I can tell you that in the next election, we'll be talking about some other distraction. And then another one. And then another one. And nothing will change.


That is one option. Or, at this moment, in this election, we can come together and say, "Not this time." This time we want to talk about the crumbling schools that are stealing the future of black children and white children and Asian children and Hispanic children and Native American children. This time we want to reject the cynicism that tells us that these kids can't learn; that those kids who don't look like us are somebody else's problem. The children of America are not those kids, they are our kids, and we will not let them fall behind in a 21st century economy. Not this time.


This time we want to talk about how the lines in the Emergency Room are filled with whites and blacks and Hispanics who do not have health care; who don't have the power on their own to overcome the special interests in Washington, but who can take them on if we do it together.


This time we want to talk about the shuttered mills that once provided a decent life for men and women of every race, and the homes for sale that once belonged to Americans from every religion, every region, every walk of life. This time we want to talk about the fact that the real problem is not that someone who doesn't look like you might take your job; it's that the corporation you work for will ship it overseas for nothing more than a profit.


This time we want to talk about the men and women of every color and creed who serve together, and fight together, and bleed together under the same proud flag. We want to talk about how to bring them home from a war that never should've been authorized and never should've been waged, and we want to talk about how we'll show our patriotism by caring for them, and their families, and giving them the benefits they have earned.


I would not be running for President if I didn't believe with all my heart that this is what the vast majority of Americans want for this country. This union may never be perfect, but generation after generation has shown that it can always be perfected. And today, whenever I find myself feeling doubtful or cynical about this possibility, what gives me the most hope is the next generation - the young people whose attitudes and beliefs and openness to change have already made history in this election.


There is one story in particularly that I'd like to leave you with today - a story I told when I had the great honor of speaking on Dr. King's birthday at his home church, Ebenezer Baptist, in Atlanta.


There is a young, twenty-three year old white woman named Ashley Baia who organized for our campaign in Florence, South Carolina. She had been working to organize a mostly African-American community since the beginning of this campaign, and one day she was at a roundtable discussion where everyone went around telling their story and why they were there.


And Ashley said that when she was nine years old, her mother got cancer. And because she had to miss days of work, she was let go and lost her health care. They had to file for bankruptcy, and that's when Ashley decided that she had to do something to help her mom.


She knew that food was one of their most expensive costs, and so Ashley convinced her mother that what she really liked and really wanted to eat more than anything else was mustard and relish sandwiches. Because that was the cheapest way to eat.


She did this for a year until her mom got better, and she told everyone at the roundtable that the reason she joined our campaign was so that she could help the millions of other children in the country who want and need to help their parents too.


Now Ashley might have made a different choice. Perhaps somebody told her along the way that the source of her mother's problems were blacks who were on welfare and too lazy to work, or Hispanics who were coming into the country illegally. But she didn't. She sought out allies in her fight against injustice.


Anyway, Ashley finishes her story and then goes around the room and asks everyone else why they're supporting the campaign. They all have different stories and reasons. Many bring up a specific issue. And finally they come to this elderly black man who's been sitting there quietly the entire time. And Ashley asks him why he's there. And he does not bring up a specific issue. He does not say health care or the economy. He does not say education or the war. He does not say that he was there because of Barack Obama. He simply says to everyone in the room, "I am here because of Ashley."


"I'm here because of Ashley." By itself, that single moment of recognition between that young white girl and that old black man is not enough. It is not enough to give health care to the sick, or jobs to the jobless, or education to our children.


But it is where we start. It is where our union grows stronger. And as so many generations have come to realize over the course of the two-hundred and twenty one years since a band of patriots signed that document in Philadelphia, that is where the perfection begins.

Tuesday, March 18, 2008

David Paterson, NY’s First Black Governor, Met with Chants, Cheers After Being Sworn In



By: Associated Press

ALBANY, N.Y. - (AP) David Paterson was sworn in as governor Monday before a crowd of lawmakers who chanted his name and cheered his message of unity in a state eager to move past his predecessor's sordid and speedy political collapse.

Paterson became the state's first black chief executive and nation's second legally blind governor almost exactly a week after allegations first surfaced that Gov. Eliot Spitzer was "Client 9" of a high-priced call girl service.

"We move forward. Today is Monday. There is work to be done," Paterson said. "There was an oath to be taken. There's trust that needs to be restored. There are issues that need to be addressed."

Spitzer, according to ex-aides, was at his Columbia County farmhouse 48 miles south at the time of Paterson's swearing-in.

Where Spitzer's 14-month tenure was marked by partisan sniping, Paterson, a fellow Democrat, reached across the aisle in his remarks from the ornate Assembly chamber. The crowd gave the new governor a two-minute standing ovation and chanted "David! David! David!"

"What we are going to do from now on is what we always should have done all along," the former state senator said. "We're going to work together."

Legislators gave Paterson hearty applause when he called for cooperation, and laughs when he made playful jabs at Republican leaders.

He said Senate Republican leader Joseph Bruno, probably Spitzer's most bitter rival, had invited him to dinner at his ranch: "I'll go. I'm going to take my taster with me."

He teased Assembly Minority Leader James Tedisco, whom Spitzer famously and profanely said he would steamroll, that he would teach him how to play basketball. Tedisco, an upstate Republican, was a basketball star at Union College.

Paterson, 53, rose from the lieutenant governor's office after Spitzer resigned last week amid allegations that he hired a call girl from a high-priced escort service. It was a dramatic fall for Spitzer, who was elected with an overwhelming share of the vote and who had vowed to root out corruption at the Capitol.

"This transition today is a historic message to the world: That we live by the same values that we profess, and we are a government of laws, not individuals," Paterson said.

Paterson took the oath of office from Chief Judge Judith Kaye, who ascended to the pinnacle of the state's highest court in 1993 after former Chief Judge Sol Wachtler was caught threatening and harassing an ex-lover.

Paterson, who becomes New York's 55th governor, has said he will get right to work. The Legislature faces an April 1 deadline to pass an estimated $124 billion budget, and Paterson also said that health care, education, jobs and problems facing "the single mother with two jobs" need immediate attention.

Paterson spoke for 26 minutes -- about half of it engaged in the banter and humor that helped define him as a lawmaker and lieutenant governor -- without notes or teleprompter.

He joked about his limited vision -- he can see things close to him out of one eye.

At Spitzer's last State of the State address, he said, Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver stopped him from accidentally breaking a glass with his gavel, then told him, "I will not allow you to turn the State of the State into a Jewish wedding."

Before reluctantly accepting Spitzer's offer to run with him as lieutenant governor, Paterson was a Democratic state senator for more than two decades, representing parts of Harlem and Manhattan's Upper West Side.

His wife, Michelle Paige Paterson, had tears in her eyes for most of the ceremony.

"Every time I hear David speak, I want to cry," she said afterward. "I'm just very happy I was able to live to see this day."

Paterson has admitted he and his wife Michelle had affairs during a rough patch in their marriage several years ago, a newspaper reported Monday.

Paterson told the New York Daily News that he maintained a relationship with another woman from 1999 until 2001. He and his wife eventually sought counseling and repaired their relationship.

The couple agreed to speak publicly about their marriage in response to rumors about Paterson's personal life that have been swirling in Albany since Spitzer resigned, the Daily News reported Monday on its Web site.

After his inauguration, Paterson and his wife acknowledged the relationships but did not go into details.

"This was a marriage that appeared to be going sour at one point," Paterson told the Daily News. "But I went to counseling and we decided we wanted to make it work. Michelle is well aware of what went on."

Paterson said top government officials are bound to be under the microscope for their personal actions, especially considering the prostitution scandal.

"Like most marriages, you go through certain difficult periods," Michelle Paterson said. "What's important is for your kids to see you worked them out."

The Patersons have two children, a 19-year-old student at Ithaca College who is from his wife's previous marriage, and 14-year-old who attends public school in New York City.

Politicians past and present, including presidential candidate Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, attended Paterson's swearing-in ceremony.

Shouts of "Go Hillary!" and "Go Obama!" echoed through the packed Assembly chamber in New York's capital Monday as Clinton made her way on the Senate floor.

Clinton, in her role as New York senator, took part in the ceremony that drew former and current elected officials and dignitaries. Paterson is one of many Democrats critical to Clinton's presidential aspirations; he is a superdelegate who backs her candidacy.

Amid the shouts, Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver, a Clinton superdelegate like Paterson, quickly gaveled the joint legislative session to order. Paterson alluded to the White House race when he welcomed Clinton at the top of his speech.

"She has a lot places to go," Paterson said, "and I'm so flattered that she would come and join us today."

Clinton did not mention presidential politics.

"It is extraordinarily historic, but it is also a great moment of personal achievement for Governor Paterson and I love the way he had his story connected with the story of New York," Clinton said as she left Paterson's swearing-in ceremony. The former lieutenant governor took office upon the resignation of Eliot Spitzer, who was caught up in a prostitution scandal.

Paterson is a longtime Clinton supporter and has campaigned for her but he faced fresh questions about his support when Spitzer resigned -- especially after he fielded a congratulatory call from Sen. Barack Obama.

Superdelegates could hold the key in a tight Democratic presidential race and both campaigns have been courting them.

Paterson said last week there was no pressure from Obama to switch. Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick, an Obama friend and supporter, said much the same Monday after meeting privately with Paterson. Patrick said Obama's name only came up in conversation when it was noted that Obama and Paterson married women with the same name: Michelle.

Clinton sat in the back of the packed Assembly chamber near New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, Patrick, New Jersey Gov. Jon Corzine and other political VIPs.

"I think most of us are optimistic that this could be a really terrific time for New York state and Albany with Gov. Paterson," said Sen. Charles Schumer, a Democrat.

Federal prosecutors must still decide whether to pursue charges against Spitzer. The married father of three teenage girls was accused of spending tens of thousands of dollars on prostitutes -- including a call girl "Kristen" in Washington the night before Valentine's Day.

Silver, talking to reporters on his way to the swearing-in, said adopting a budget will be the priority even with the recent turmoil. With an expected debt of more than $4.6 billion, the job won't be easy.

"It's a daunting task, but I think with all the good will that's created, with the leadership of David Paterson, we're going to have a logical conclusion to a budget process," Silver said.

Bruno said the Democrat-led Assembly and his Republican majority in the Senate remain billions apart in budget negotiations, and "David is going to be right in the middle."

"I think he can be one of the best governors the state has ever had," Bruno said.

TROUBLING HISTORICALLY BLACK COLLEGE UPDATE: Many Face Severe Problems and Possible Extinction.



Many of the nation's historically Black colleges and universities (HBCUs) are strapped for cash, have suffered cutbacks in both state and federal government funding and questions are being raised about the need for their continued existence in the post-Civil Rights Movement era.

The above represent some of the thoughts expressed last week by the presidents of some of the nation's top Black colleges as they testified before the House Education and Labor Committee.

But Kentucky State University President Mary Sias spoke for the group telling the committee, "HBCUs are and continue to be needed and are as vital now to the educational system in America as they have ever been."

Experts currently estimate that while historically Black colleges represent only 4 percent of all institutions of higher education, they graduate 40 percent of all African American students.

In addition, the single biggest problem facing the Black schools appears to be adequate funding.

For example, a 2005 report by the National Science Foundation found that six percent of the nation's top predominantly white universities received more federal funds for research than 79 historically Black colleges and universities combined.

Monday, March 17, 2008

IS PLANNED PARENTHOOD A COVER FOR BLACK GENOCIDE?: A UCLA student newspaper makes that assertion; uses taped phone call as evidence.



Is Planned Parenthood a racist organization with a covert mission to control black births? Well if you believe a UCLA right-to-life student newspaper called The Advocate and other reports, it would be hard to argue against that allegation.

Last Wednesday, in Idaho, Planned Parenthood officials apologized Wednesday for what they called an employee's "serious mistake" in encouraging a donation aimed at aborting black babies, reports the Idaho Statesman.


The organization also lashed out at The Advocate for trying to discredit employees in seven states in a series of tape-recorded phone calls last summer.


In Idaho, last July, The Adcocate's call went to Autumn Kersey, vice president of development and marketing for Planned Parenthood of Idaho. A recording provided by The Advocate has an actor portraying a donor saying that he wanted his money used to eliminate unborn black children because "the less black kids out there the better."


Laughing nervously, Kersey responds: "Understandable, understandable. ... Excuse my hesitation, this is the first time I've had a donor call and make this kind of request, so I'm excited and want to make sure I don't leave anything out."


The Advocate says this is evidence that Planned Parenthood targets minorities and minority neighborhoods.


Meanwhile, on Wednesday, according to The Statesman, Planned Parenthood of Idaho "firmly and unequivocally" denounced racial bias, admitted making a mistake and said the group had taken corrective action.


"A fundraising employee violated the organization's principles and practices when she appeared to be willing to accept a racially motivated donation," said CEO Rebecca Poedy in a written statement. "We apologize for the manner in which this offensive call was handled. We take full responsibility for the actions of the fundraising staff member who created the impression that racism of any form would be tolerated at Planned Parenthood. We took swift action to ensure that each of our employees understands their responsibility to communicate clearly with donors about the fact that we believe in helping all individuals, regardless of gender, race, or sexual orientation, make informed decisions about their reproductive health care."


A spokeswoman for the organization would not say whether further disciplinary action was taken against Kersey, saying that was a personnel matter.


Not surprisingly, Planned Parenthood officials in Idaho blasted The Advocate's actions


"While the actions of our staff member were unacceptable, it's also unacceptable for opponents of abortion to use racist, deceptive tactics to smear Planned Parenthood," Poedy said. "The race-baiting tactics on display in this case are not news 'exposes,' but rather the product of the most cynical form of politicking."


In response, Lila Rose, the editor-in-chief of The Advocate said that the organization shouldn't focus on what the students did (or how they did it). In Idaho it is legal to secretly record a phone call


"They do not change their ways," Rose said. "They attack the whistleblower. It is unacceptable for a nonprofit to accept donations that target specific races," Rose said.


Nationwide, Planned Parenthood received about $902 million in revenue in 2005-06, according to its annual report. Private donations made up about 24 percent, or $212 million.


Make up your own mind. Watch a YouTube report on the 'Evils of Planned ParentHood 2':



Transcript of The Advocate's phone call to Autum Kersey at Planned Parenthood of Idah

Autumn Kersey of Planned Parenthood in Boise: Good afternoon, this is Autumn.

Donor: Hello, Autumn, I'm interested in making a donation today.

Kersey: Fantastic!

Donor: What about abortions for the underprivileged minority groups?

Kersey: Oh, absolutely. We have, um, in fact, uh wonderful, fantastic news. We just received a very generous donation to our women in need fund.

Donor: Wonderful. I want to specify that abortion to help a minority group - would that be possible?

Kersey: Absolutely.

Donor: Like the black community for example?

Kersey: Certainly.

Donor: OK, so the abortion I can give money specifically for a black baby, that would be the purpose.

Kersey: Absolutely. If you wanted to designate that you wanted your gift to be used to help (an) African-American woman in need, then we would certainly make sure that that gift was earmarked specifically for that purpose.

Donor: Great. Because I really face trouble with affirmative action, and I don't want my kids being disadvantaged, you know, against black kids. I just had a baby; I want to put it in his name, you know.

Kersey: Hmm, absolutely.

Donor: So that's definitely possible.

Kersey: Oh, always, always.

Donor: So I just wanna - can I put this in the name of my son?

Kersey: Absolutely.

Donor: Yeah, he's trying to get into colleges, and he's going to be applying, you know, he's justwe're just really bighe's really faced troubles with affirmative action.

Kersey: Mhmm.

Donor: And we don't, you know, we just think, you know, the less black kids out there the better.

Kersey: (Laughs) Understandable, understandable. ... Um David, let me, if I may, just get some sort of specific general information so we can set this up the right way. You said you wanted to put it in your son's name, and you would like this designated specifically to assist (an) African-American woman who's looking to terminate a pregnancy.

Donor: Exactly, and yeah, I wanna protect my son, so he can get into college.

Kersey: All right. Excuse my hesitation, um, um, this is the first time I've had a donor call and make this kind of request, so I'm excited, and I wanna make sure I don't leave anything out.

DIDDY AND BIGGIE KNEW ABOUT TUPAC ATTACK: LA Times article points finger at Combs and Notorious B.I.G. in 15 Year-old assault.



New evidence has linked two associates of entertainment mogul Sean "Diddy" Combs and the late Christopher "Notorious B.I.G." Wallace to the 1994 beating of iconic rapper Tupac Shakur.

The article, written by Chuck Phillips on the L.A. Times website reveals that although Combs and Wallace knew about the Shakur ambush before it happened, there is no evidence that supports that they were involved in the actual attack.


The story claims that Combs was present in the Quad Recording Studio with at least two dozen Bad Boy Records Associates when the assault took place ten floors down in the lobby.


Shakur was pistol-whipped, shot five times and left for dead outside a New York City recording studio.


"It was supposed to just be a beating but it turned into a shooting because Tupac pulled a gun," Philips said.


Afterwards Shakur wrote about who he believed was involved in a song.

Phillips maintains that "Tupac's shooting at the Quad was really catalyst for everything that happened afterwards, including the death of Biggie (Christopher "Biggie/Notorious B.I.G" Wallace).


"It started the whole thing off and if you lay it out in a timeline which I do, you can see; it's obvious and kind of sad for two guys to be this talented."


The two men reported to have been involved in the attack are James "Jimmy" Sabatino and Czar Entertainment CEO Jimmy "Henchmen" Rosemond.


Sabatino is the son of a reputed captain in the Colombo crime family. Sabatino is said to have personally told Combs about the planned attack. Rosemond, it was speculated, was part of the attack as payback to Shakur for being slighted over prior agreements.


Soon after Shakur's 1994 assualt, sources claim Sabatino introduced Combs to mobsters and escorted the music executive to mobbed-up nightclubs in New York and Miami after he was welcomed into Combs' inner circle.


It's also alleged that Sabatino used fake credit cards to charge up hundreds of thousands of dollars in bills for posh hotel suites, limos and parties while doing busines with Combs during his 1997 No Way Out tour.


Sabatino's relationship with Combs allegedly continued as he worked with the mogul's Bad Boy Records until his 1998 arrest in London. Currently he is serving a 12 year sentence in a federal penitentiary for racketeering and wire fraud.


The implications are the latest in a series of events surrounding the murder of Shakur, who was shot to death in 1996 in Las Vegas, and Wallace, who met the same fate in Los Angeles a year later.


There is no evidence to suggest that Combs or Wallace were involved in the Shakur attack, only that they had prior knowledge of it.


Phillips also says the Shakur case has ties to the murder of Jason "Jam Master Jay" Mizell. One of the men present when Shakur was shot, Randy "Stretch" Walker, was later gunned down in Queens, New York on November 30, 1995, exactly one day to the date of the Quad Recordings shooting.


Combs and Wallace both denied any involvement in the 1994 attack. Combs or a representative could not be reached at EUR press time.


An interactive timeline, as well as audio of lyrics and videos from Shakur and Wallace is featured in Phillips' story available on the L.A. Times website: www.latimes.com/tupac.