George Zimmerman Trial Livestream

Wednesday, April 30, 2008

Has the Government Been a Friend or Foe for Minority Groups?


The Cato Institute's Casey Lartigue discusses whether the government has been overall a friend or an adversary for American minority groups.



"Race and the State," featuring Bruce Bartlett and Casey Lartigue.

Is government more likely to be the friend or adversary of minority groups? Has it been liberals, conservatives, or libertarians like William Lloyd Garrison and Frederick Douglass who have been the most consistent defenders of everyone's rights? What does history suggest would be the best public policy for racial minorities in the 21st century?

Bruce Bartlett, a former Reagan administration economist with a provocative new book, and Casey Lartigue, coeditor of Educational Freedom in Urban America and a controversial former XM 169 talk show host, will discuss these questions - Cato Institute

Casey Lartigue is a former policy analyst with Cato's Center for Educational Freedom. His research expertise includes school choice, teacher quality and minority education. His writings have been published in USA Today, Ed. magazine published at the Harvard Graduate School of Education, Education Week, the New York Post, the Washington Times, Asian Week and the Washington Post.

Before joining the Center, he worked as a staff writer at Cato. He has spoken at the National Press Club, Harvard Law School, the Harvard Graduate School of Education, been a guest on the Rush Limbaugh Show, and testified before Congress on school choice in the nation's capital.

Prior to joining Cato, Lartigue taught English and worked as a language examiner in Taiwan and South Korea. Lartigue received a bachelor's degree from the Harvard University Extension School and a master's degree from the Harvard Graduate School of Education.

Pained by Wright’s Comments, Suggestion of Pandering, Barack Obama Blasts Former Pastor


By: Jackie Jones and Sherrel Wheeler Stewart, BlackAmericaWeb.com

In the strongest language to date, Sen. Barack Obama denounced the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, saying his former pastor’s recent statements “contradict everything I have been about.”

Obama’s remarks came a day after Wright delivered a speech at the National Press Club in Washington. In a question-and-answer session afterward, Wright said criticism of his previous remarks were not an attack on him, but the black church. He also criticized the U.S. government as imperialist and stood by his suggestion that the United States invented the HIV virus as a means of genocide against minorities.

"Based on this Tuskegee experiment and based on what has happened to Africans in this country, I believe our government is capable of doing anything," he said.

And perhaps even worse for Obama, Wright suggested that the church congregant secretly concurs.

"He was presenting a world view that contradicts who I am and what I stand for," Obama said at a news conference in Winston-Salem, North Carolina. "And what I think particularly angered me was his suggestion somehow that my previous denunciation of his remarks were somehow political posturing. Anybody who knows me and anybody who knows what I'm about knows that I am about trying to bridge gaps and I see the commonality in all people."

Wright’s speech was one of a series of public appearances, including an extensive interview on PBS with Bill Moyers aired Friday and a speech before the NAACP on Sunday, that the minister said were aimed to clarify remarks in his sermons that he said have been taken out of context.

At the Press Club, before reporters and a supportive audience of black church leaders beginning a two-day symposium, Wright said the black church tradition was not understood by the "dominant culture" in the United States.

Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago, which he formerly pastored, has a long history of liberating the oppressed by feeding the hungry, supporting recovery for the addicted and helping senior citizens in need, and some of its members have fought in the military, including in Afghanistan and Iraq, Wright said.

Wright also clearly enjoyed zinging some reporters whose questions, he said, showed the mainstream media understood neither the black church nor his positions about a variety of issues. Playing to a clearly supportive audience, Wright laughed, pointed to audience members and even slapped five with someone after getting off particularly good lines.

“I am outraged by the comments that were made and saddened by the spectacle that we saw yesterday," said Obama, who noted that in the first news cycle following the release of excerpts seemed a “simplification” and a “caricature” of who Wright was, but that after his appearance at the Press Club, “yesterday I think he caricatured himself.”

The Illinois senator said of Wright's statements: "All it was was a bunch of rants that aren't grounded in truth."

"Obviously, whatever relationship I had with Reverend Wright has changed," Obama said. "I don't think he showed much concern for me, more importantly I don't think he showed much concern for what we're trying to do in this campaign."

Obama said he heard that Wright had given "a performance" and when he watched news accounts, he realized that it more than just a case of the former pastor defending himself.

"His comments were not only divisive and destructive, I believe they end up giving comfort to those who prey on hate," Obama said. "I'll be honest with you, I hadn't seen it" when reacting initially on Monday, he said.

Obama tried to put controversial snippets of a Wright sermon, shown on a seemingly endless loop of sound bites, behind him in a major speech on race in March. The presidential candidate said Tuesday that he spoke to Wright afterwards, and “I was very clear that what he had said in those particular snippets I have found objectionable and offensive and that the purpose of the speech was to provide context for them, but not excuse them.”

Obama appeared to be personally pained by Wright's assertion that "politicians say what they say and do what they do based on electability, based on sound bites, based on polls, Huffington, whoever’s doing the polls," a statement that raised eyebrows about Obama's authenticity as a candidate running on campaign of change.

He was saddened, he said, that Wright chose to portray his disagreement with the minister’s remarks as pandering.

“If Rev. Wright thinks that’s political posturing, as he put it yesterday, then he doesn’t know me very well,” Obama said.

Obama said he has not spoken to Wright since the cleric began his public tour, but was speaking out yesterday to make clear that Wright did not speak for him or the Obama campaign.

“In some ways, what Rev. Wright said yesterday directly contradicts everything that I’ve done during my life. It contradicts how I was raised and the setting in which I was raised,” Obama said. “It contradicts my decisions to pursue a career of public service. It contradicts the issues that I’ve worked on politically. It contradicts what I’ve said in my books. It contradicts what I said in my convention speech in 2004. It contradicts my announcement. It contradicts everything that I’ve been saying on this campaign trail.”

Obama has been a member of Trinity UCC for about 20 years. Wright, as its senior pastor, performed the Obamas' marriage rites and baptized the couple's two daughters. The title of Obama's second book, "The Audacity of Hope," came from a Wright sermon.

When young blacks move to Chicago to work, Trinity is one of the churches recommended by other professionals because of its ministries and opportunities to network, MSNBC anchor Tamron Hall said on "Hardball" Tuesday. She visited the church several times, she said, but maintained that she had not heard the kind of speech that has placed the Wright in a national spotlight.

Hall said following Wright’s Monday interview at the National Press Club, some of the members expressed their dismay to her, saying they thought Wright "was showing out.”

Receptionists at the 8,000 member church told BlackAmericaWeb.com that they were being flooded with calls on Tuesday. Still, they diligently took messages and promised to pass them on to the church spokeswoman, who was traveling back to Chicago from Washington, D.C. on Tuesday and could not respond immediately to questions.

Trinity has stood firmly behind Wright, a man who, for over more than three decades, led the church in becoming the largest in the predominately white denomination. He will be officially replaced in June by the Rev. Otis Moss III, 37, who is known for his ability to dialog with youths and attract them to church and ministry.

The flap has given the young minister an unfortunate inaugural challenge as Trinity's leader, observers say.

"Pastor Moss has inherited the repercussions of an attack he had nothing to do with," said Brenda Salter McNeil, president of an Oak Park-based company that works on diversity issues in Christian organizations. "He has to pastor a people through it."

Moss, an assistant pastor at Trinity for two years, is a Yale Divinity School graduate whose father also is a prominent preacher and a former adviser to the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. His sermons often feature quotes and stories of the late civil rights leader, who officiated at his parents' wedding.

“What's amazing to me is the fact so many don't get why Wright is taking his time in the spotlight to defend himself in this Obama flap. Basically, it's about his ego,” Milwaukee Journal Sentinel columnist Eugene Kane said in an online discussion of Obama’s remarks.

“He's done great work for 40 years, but nobody outside Chicago really knew who he was. NOW everybody does,” Kane said of Wright, who was well known in religious circles, but not many secular ones. “It's not a trait uncommon to preachers, politicians or even journalists who get a bit of national attention and suddenly they start to believe everybody needs to hear their opinions all the time. Frankly, Wright is just doing what everybody in America does when they experience fame; they strike while the iron is hot.”

Obama said he was distressed that controversy over Wright’s remarks has created a distraction from the real issues of the campaign.

“People want some help in stabilizing their lives and securing a better future for themselves and their children. And that’s what we should be talking about,” Obama said.

Fredrick C. Harris, a Columbia University professor and author of "Something Within: Religion in African American Political Activism," said the impact of Wright’s weekend speeches and Obama’s response will vary among voters.

“Wright has his legacy, and he has a right to defend it. But if, in any way, his performance is seen as diminishing the possibility of Barack Obama becoming America’s first black president, he will go down in history as one black man who dragged another black man down,” Harris told BlackAmericaWeb.com.

As for Obama’s response, Harris said, “In his speech in Philadelphia, Obama said he could not disown Wright. Now it seems like he is finally distancing himself.” But some in the black community may take issue with his choice, he said. “They may see this as Obama not showing loyalty to his pastor."

David Bositis, a senior analyst for the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies, a black think tank, told BlackAmericaWeb.com in an interview after Wright’s PBS appearance that the episode was a distraction, and voters were tired of it.

“Will there be people who take advantage of it, who would use that, including Clinton? Yes, but things are really bad right now, and I don’t think that this election is going to be about Rev. Wright,” Bositis said. “It’s going to be about people afraid of losing their jobs, losing their homes, with not enough money to pay their energy bills and put food on the table.”


Associated Press contributed to this story.

DNA Frees Man Imprisoned for 27 Years


By: Schuyler Dixon, Associated Press

DALLAS - (AP) A Dallas man who spent more than 27 years in prison for a murder he didn't commit was freed Tuesday, after being incarcerated longer than any other wrongfully convicted U.S. inmate cleared by DNA testing

James Lee Woodard stepped out of the courtroom and raised his arms to a throng of photographers. Supporters and other people gathered outside the court erupted in applause.

"No words can express what a tragic story yours is," state District Judge Mark Stoltz told Woodard at a brief hearing before his release.

Woodard, cleared of the 1980 murder of his girlfriend, became the 18th person in Dallas County to have his conviction cast aside. That's a figure unmatched by any county nationally, according to the Innocence Project, a New York-based legal center that specializes in overturning wrongful convictions.

"I thank God for the existence of the Innocence project," Woodard, 55, told the court. "Without that, I wouldn't be here today. I would be wasting away in prison."

Overall, 31 people have been formally exonerated through DNA testing in Texas, also a national high. That does not include Woodard and at least three others whose exonerations will not become official until Gov. Rick Perry grants pardons or the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals formally accepts the ruling of lower courts that have already recommended exoneration.

Woodard was sentenced to life in prison in July 1981 for the murder of a 21-year-old Dallas woman found sexually assaulted and strangled near the banks of the Trinity River.

He was convicted primarily on the basis of testimony from two eyewitnesses, said Natalie Roetzel, the executive director of the Innocence Project of Texas. One has since recanted in an affidavit. As for the other, "we don't believe her testimony was accurate," Roetzel said.

Like nearly all the exonorees, Woodard has maintained his innocence throughout his time in prison. But after filing six writs with an appeals court, plus two requests for DNA testing, his pleas of innocence became so repetitive and routine that "the courthouse doors were eventually closed to him and he was labeled a writ abuser," Roetzel said.

"On the first day he was arrested, he told the world he was innocent ... and nobody listened," Jeff Blackburn, chief counsel for the Innocence Project of Texas, said during Tuesday's hearing.

More Kilpatrick Text Messages Revealed


By: Corey Williams, Associated Press

DETROIT - (AP) A series of often explicit text messages from Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick's former chief of staff appear to show she had a long-term romantic relationship with the mayor and that he played a role in the firing of a police officer who sued the city.

The embarrassing messages between Kilpatrick and Christine Beatty from 2002 and 2003 appear in an 18-page document released Tuesday on the orders of Wayne County Circuit Court Judge Robert J. Colombo Jr. in response to a lawsuit by the Detroit Free Press and The Detroit News.

The document was obtained from the computer of Michael Stefani, an attorney who represented three police officers in whistle-blowers' lawsuits against the city that were settled last year for $8.4 million. The text messages were taken from Beatty's city-issued pagers.

The messages could prove damaging to Kilpatrick and Beatty, who are accused of lying under oath in one of the lawsuits by denying they had an intimate relationship. They are charged with perjury, misconduct and obstruction of justice. Both have denied wrongdoing.

The Free Press published some of the text messages in January. Wayne County prosecutors began the perjury investigation after those excerpts were released.

The document released Tuesday includes descriptions of sexual trysts, the frequent use of the N-word by the mayor and Beatty as a term of endearment, and discussions of marriage.

On Sept. 15, 2002, Beatty described a sex act she wanted to perform on the mayor but said she didn't know how to approach him about it. He replied: "Next time, just tell me to sit down, shut up and do your thing!"

Later that month, the pair appeared to arrange a sexual encounter in Beatty's office. On Sept. 19, 2002, Beatty wrote to Kilpatrick: "I have wanted to hold you so badly all day, but I was trying to stay focused on work. So, I promise, not to keep you longer than 15 minutes."

Kilpatrick replied: "Don't promise (N-word.)"

Beatty said: "I'm in my office. Do you want me to come to yours or you coming to mine?"

Kilpatrick said: "I'm coming down there ... LOL ditto. Freaky Chris!"

The text messages also appear to show Kilpatrick was involved in the decision to fire one of the former officers, former Deputy Chief Gary Brown, which Kilpatrick also denied under oath as part of the lawsuit.

In a text message Beatty sent to Kilpatrick on May 15, 2003, that was contained in the document released Tuesday, she said: "I'm sorry that we are going through this mess because of a decision that we made to fire Gary Brown."

Kilpatrick said last September that the city would appeal a jury's verdict in favor of two officers in one of the lawsuits. But after Stefani gave one of Kilpatrick's lawyers a motion for attorney's fees that contained excerpts of the text messages, the suit was settled and the motion was never filed in court.

The judge said Tuesday he agreed to release the document because he believes it directly led to the deal that was reached between the three former officers and the city.

Following a community forum Tuesday evening, Kilpatrick questioned the authenticity of the messages and said their release did not provide a "the smoking gun" some had expected.

"All the lawyers have testified that this had nothing to do with the settlement." Kilpatrick said.

"It seems that it's just a regurgitation of old news. And it's unfortunate that now we're printing something as true that came off somebody's computer," he said.

Mayer Morganroth, who represents Beatty, said he believes the text messages were obtained illegally and the excerpts should not have been released.

Most of the text messages included in the document focus on the relationship between Kilpatrick and Beatty, both 37, who have been friends since high school.

On April 8, 2003, Beatty wrote: "You told me that you would be my boyfriend everyday until I was your wife. Are you renigging?"

Kilpatrick replied: "Hell no! Don't start none. Won't be none ...! LOL".

Kilpatrick remains married to his wife, Carlita. Beatty left her husband at the end of April 2003, according to the document.

On April 13, 2003, Beatty wrote to Kilpatrick: "It is sometimes so amazing how much I love you. I can't even describe most of the time how I feel inside when I think about you. You are an amazing man. Everything about you makes me love you. Your passion about life, your sense of humor, your presence, and your love of family."

On May 1, 2003, Beatty referred to her separation from her husband: "I can't see living this way with us being a 'secret' forever. I love you so much and I want to tell somebody, someday! (Smile)."

Kilpatrick responded: "In this important and somewhat confusing time in your life, please know with all our hearts and soul that I love you. And you will never, never be alone."

Tuesday, April 29, 2008

Barack Obama Repudiates Rev. Jeremiah Wright


Barack Obama, April 29, 2008

UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG BLACK MALES APPROACHING CRISIS?: Senator Charles Schumer thinks so.



Is unemployment among groups of African American males approaching the crisis level?

New York Senator Charles Schumer thinks it maybe saying in a speech in Buffalo last week that the figures “take your breath away.”


Schumer said one of the most depressing figures is the recent finding that 72 percent of Black men who dropped out of high school are unemployed.


Schumer detailed several plans of his own to address the problem and challenged the presidential candidates to take up the issue and discuss it openly as they continue they bids for the White House.


Among Schumer’s proposals is an expansion of the earned income tax credit to single men so that “work really pays if you don’t have children you are living with but you are still paying your child support.”

THE SEAN BELL VERDICT: No, No, No ... Not God Bless America , God Damn America !

By Lloyd Kam Williams

'When it came to treating her citizens of African descent fairly, America failed… The government put them outside the equal protection of the law… and locked them into positions of hopelessness and helplessness. The government… wants us to sing 'God Bless America.' No, no, no. Not God bless America, God damn America! That's in the Bible for killing innocent people. God damn America for treating our citizens as less than human! The United States government has failed the vast majority of her citizens of African descent. Think about this… think about this." -- Reverend Jeremiah Wright, 4/13/03

'The testimony just didn't make sense… Accordingly, the court finds each defendant not guilty of each of the respective counts in the indictment of which they were charged." -- Judge Arthur Cooperman, 4/25/08

About a hundred years ago, WEB Du Bois predicted that the question of the color line would be the defining problem of the 20th Century. In spite of Martin Luther King's elusive dream of the day when black Americans would be judged not by the color of their skin but by the content of their character, it appears that it is destined to remain the incendiary issue of the this century as well.

Earlier this year, even a suddenly-introspective Condoleezza Rice referred to slavery as the country's original sin, lamenting, "What I would like understood as a black American is that black Americans loved and had faith in this country even when this country didn't love and have faith in them - and that's our legacy." And now the not guilty verdict in the Sean Bell case is a clear indication that African-Americans are still considered second-class citizens in the eyes of the Criminal Justice System.

How else can you explain the rationalization by Judge Arthur Cooperman that five undercover NYPD detectives were legally justified in pumping 50 bullets into an unarmed Sean Bell on the night before his wedding? Although the black community had understandably been outraged back in November of 2006 upon learning of the tragedy, patience prevailed as it opted to abide by the Queens District Attorney's Office assurances that justice would eventually be served.

It is for this reason that I find Judge Cooperman's rewarding that trust by handing down such an insulting decision so dismaying. He totally exonerated the police of all eight counts in the indictment while simultaneously ridiculing the prosecution's case and eyewitnesses as if they were a joke. This amounts to a slap in the face of the community.

I am very familiar with South Jamaica, the middle class neighborhood where the incident occurred, for I was born and raised there. And my mother still lives there with one of my brothers and his family, as do many of my cousins and other relatives and childhood friends.

The tone of Cooperman's remarks would never have been so insensitive if the same cops had unleashed a hail of bullets on an innocent, defenseless white man. Many are asking, how is it that such trigger-happy policing of African-American communities can continue to be rubber-stamped by the bench as if there is a much lower threshold for state-sanctioned use of deadly force against blacks than against whites?

Neither this incident nor its resolution is without precedent. All I have to do is mention the name of Amadou Diallo to trigger thoughts of the country's disgraceful legacy of dispensing vigilante justice to blacks, from the whippings and brandings doled out during days of slavery through the 100 years of lynching post emancipation clear up to present-day police intimidation tactics like racial profiling which inexorably lead to unfortunate deaths like that of Sean Bell.

So, the next time the mainstream media replays its favorite sound bite of Reverend Jeremiah Wright fuming, " God Bless America? No, no, no! Not God bless America, God damn America!" just remember that he's merely ministering to a beleaguered people with whom that message has been readily resonating for ages.

Lloyd Kam Williams is an attorney and a member of the NJ, NY, CT, PA, MA & US Supreme Court bars.

College Programs Target Students Early


By: Mark Pratt, Associated Press

BOSTON - (AP) Most students at Mildred Avenue Middle School come from low-income, minority families and have parents who didn't go to college. Many don't speak English at home and have no plans to attend college.

Which is exactly why officials decided to make it the only middle school in Boston with a full-time college counseling office. They want to convince the school's 560 students that college is attainable.

Middle school offices specifically dedicated to college guidance are part of a growing trend at schools across the country as officials try to make sure students don't begin planning too late.

"Middle school is when students are still open to all the opportunities and options they have, because by the time they get to high school they are often at the point where they say 'Oh, I can't do that,'" said Jill Cook, assistant director of the American School Counselor Association.

Getting to students early is especially important in a time when many elite schools are either increasing financial aid or eliminating loans for low-income students, said Bill Fitzsimmons, Harvard University's dean of admissions.

The Mildred Avenue program, funded in part by a Gear Up grant from the Department of Education and managed by TERI, a nonprofit group that helps students plan and pay for college, is one of seven middle school college-guidance programs in the state.

All serve largely low-income students, who are statistically less likely to attend college. About 31 percent of low-income, college-age students enroll, compared to 75 percent of high-income students, according to the Washington D.C.-based Pell Institute, which promotes better college access.

Gear Up -- which stands for Gaining Early Awareness and Readiness for Undergraduate Programs -- has been successful is setting up counseling offices in middle schools and high schools across the country, said Diane Jones, assistant secretary for postsecondary education. More than 55 percent of students involved in Gear Up programs enrolled in college within a year of graduation, she said.

Rashad Cope and Jeanna Murat, who run the college guidance office at Mildred Avenue, focus on different ideas for different grade levels. Seventh-graders learn about types of colleges - junior, undergraduate and graduate - and how much schooling they would need for different careers.

One student, Shante Maddix, looked flabbergasted recently when Murat told her she would need at least four years of college, followed by another three years of law school, to become a judge. That estimate didn't include the time it would take to be elected or appointed.

Still, Shante wasn't discouraged.

"I was kind of surprised by how long it would take, but it hasn't made me change my mind," she said. "It doesn't matter what I have to do."

In eighth grade, students learn about how they can finance their education, about dorm life and how to manage money and time.

They make campus visits to colleges in the Boston area and even one out-of-state visit this spring, scheduled for Rutgers University in New Jersey.

Cope, who grew up in Boston, attended Boston public schools, and went on to Fitchburg State College, tracks students when they get to high school to make sure they are taking the right classes and performing well.

Eighth-grader Larisa Osorio is among the students who has taken full advantage of the help the program offers. Her study skills have improved, her grades are up, and she's focused on what she needs to do academically to attain her goal of owning a health spa.

"I learned that I have to take health classes, learn about anatomy, the nervous system, then when I get into college, take business classes so I could learn how to maintain my own business," she said.

Rev. Wright Has His Say, Speaking On the Black Church, His Sermons – and Barack Obama


By: Jackie Jones, BlackAmericaWeb.com

Just as many critics and pundits who have attacked his remarks based on excerpts of a sermon have not listened to the entire sermon, neither has Sen. Barack Obama, who distanced himself from the remarks, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright said Monday.

Wright delivered a speech at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C. that was partly a brief tutorial on the prophetic tradition of the black church and an attempt to clarify remarks in his sermons that he said have been taken out of context.

Asked during a question-and-answer period after the speech why he waited nearly a month before responding to charges that he was bigoted, unpatriotic and inflammatory, Wright said he felt the need to speak out now because the characterization of his critics' remarks were less about him and more about a faulty definition of the black church.

“This is not an attack on Jeremiah Wright; this is an attack on the black church,” Wright said.

Television pundits suggested that Wright came off as flippant, even petulant at times, but Richard Prince, author of Journal-isms, a regular e-column about the journalism industry, said Wright found a receptive audience at the Press Club.

“I have to say that the sentiment in the room -- black clergy, divinity school types, bishops, etc. -- was entirely in Wright's favor,” Prince told BlackAmericaWeb.com in an e-mail interview. “As he said, he does not see himself in relation to Obama's campaign. He will be a pastor on Nov. 5 and Jan. 21 and has his own reputation to protect and own work to do, he said. He saw himself as speaking for the black church, not for Obama.”

There were a number of non-journalists in the room, including clergy and such notables as Cornel West, who enjoyed some of the lines Wright delivered during the question-and-answer session, which seemed to highlight his earlier points about the mainstream media not understanding neither the black church nor his positions about a variety of issues.

“He could be called flippant,” Prince said, “but the audience was eating it up. He was among his own. ‘You on it! You on it!’ one woman near me said.”

“Dr. Wright's interview with Bill Moyers and today's speech at the NPC were very beneficial in fleshing out who Rev. Dr. Jeremiah Wright is as a person and pastor, in addition to putting into context the sound bites looped repeatedly through various mediums,” said the Rev. Susan Newman, PhD, adjunct minister at Peoples Congregational United Church of Christ in Washington.

“The two-day ‘Teach-In on the Theology of the Black Church’ held in D.C. today and tomorrow is sponsored by The Samuel Dewitt Proctor Conference, Howard University Divinity School and the United Church of Christ. For these two days, our nation’s leading black theologians, historians and sociologists are gathering to discuss the prophetic tradition of the black church and how it is viewed by society today. As Jeremiah has pointed out, what we have witnessed recently has not been an attack on Pastor Wright, but an attack on the black church,” Newman said in an e-mail interview from Kansas City, where she is attending another conference.

“The black church has always spoken truth to injustices in our society -- wherever it shows up -- racist people, systems, policies, government, private clubs, education, housing, employment, sports, media, entertainment and even in the church. The degree of heightened awareness and reaction to Jeremiah Wright only happened because he was the pastor of a man running for the president of the United States,” Newman added.

“For me, it didn’t detract from Obama’s perspective on race in this country,” said Maria Garriott, author of “A Thousand Resurrections,” which chronicles her and her minister husband’s assignment to build a multicultural ministry in Baltimore.

Garriott, who is white, also lectures about racial reconciliation in the church. She said that while she is able to put Wright’s remarks in context, it may not be so easy for others.

“I think these remarks are more difficult for those who work in a mono-cultural setting,” Garriott told BlackAmericaWeb.com.

She relayed the story of a close relative who believed she had demonstrated sensitivity to black co-workers and who felt wounded by Wright’s remarks.

“She was kind of hurt, and she said, ‘It made me wonder if that’s what my African American co-workers think of me,’” Garriott said. “I would hope people would see the whole controversy as an opportunity to have an honest discussion about race.”

Garriott added that she wished that Obama’s speech on race had gotten as much play as the original excerpts of Wright’s sermon because it was illustrative of Obama’s ability to build bridges between different communities.

“That’s the harder work, to be a bridge builder,” Garriott said.

While Wright spoke, a small group of protestors outside the National Press Club marched with picket signs that read “Wright Wrong” and “God Damn Wright,” and some media and political observers say the minister’s public remarks made things worse instead of better.

“Wright's recent appearances will continue to hurt the candidate, because the reverend is the radical Obama never was, and he's close enough to give skeptical white voters an excuse,” St. Petersburg Times media critic Eric Deggans said in his blog, posted minutes after the conclusion of Wright’s remarks. “Right now, Wright is holding court before the world's TV cameras and an admiring audience at the Press Club. His dismissive attitude toward the moderator's questions -- which basically articulate the concerns many white voters have about Wright's public statements and positions -- are playing well in the room, but will likely stoke anger among the assembled press and probably among some white viewers.”

“If this man cares one whit about getting an African-American elected, he ought to get off the national stage,” David Gergen, a White House adviser to Presidents Nixon, Ford, Reagan and Clinton and political analyst told CNN.

Author, columnist, radio host and CNN contributor Roland Martin agreed with Gergen and told CNN that Wright has created a distraction from the issues that voters are genuinely concerned about, such as the war, HIV/AIDS and the economy.

Denise Savage, a consultant based in Washington, is one such voter.

“Nobody follows anybody totally, and I wish the press would stop talking about it,” Savage told BlackAmericaWeb.com.

“If every Catholic were following all the tenets and all the dogma set forth by the pope, there would be trillions of Catholics because no one would be practicing birth control. So why are we holding Obama to such a higher standard? He does not follow every tenet of Wright, and no one follows every tenet of their pastors," said Savage, a former Clinton supporter who switched to Obama just before the D.C. primary in February.

In an effort to end on a light note, moderator Donna Leinwand, National Press Club vice president, repeated part of a joke originally told by Chris Rock about Wright.

“Of course, Rev. Wright’s an angry 75-year-old black man. All 75-year-old black men are angry,” Leinwand quoted from the joke.

Asked by Leinwand “Is that funny? Is that true? Is that unfortunate?” the 66-year-old Wright replied: “It’s just like the media. I’m not 75.”

Monday, April 28, 2008

Barack Obama Goes on Fox News Sunday


Barack Obama on Fox News Sunday, April 27, 2008

Rev. Jeremiah Wright Defending Himself, But Is He Hurting Barack Obama in the Process?



By: Jackie Jones, BlackAmericaWeb.com

The Rev. Jeremiah Wright’s recent schedule of public appearances, including a prime-time television interview with Bill Moyers Friday, either threaten to pose a major problem for Sen. Barack Obama’s presidential campaign or is absolutely meaningless in the grand scheme of things, depending on to whom you talk.

“I don’t think it’s helpful for Obama at all,” said radio host, columnist and CNN contributor Roland Martin. “The story was dying down. Now, all of a sudden, with two critical primaries two weeks away, that could have an impact.”

Wright, former pastor at Chicago's Trinity United Church of Christ, Obama's church home, said that publicizing sound bites of sermons from several years ago in which he condemned U.S. policies was “unfair” and “devious,” and done by people who know nothing about his ministry, he told "Bill Moyers’ Journal" in a PBS interview.

As an activist, he is accustomed to being “at odds with the establishment,” but the response to the sermons has been “very, very unsettling,” Wright said.

In a major address on race on March 18 in Philadelphia, Obama described the history of injustice that fueled Wright's comments, acknowledged white resentment of being portrayed as privileged and/or bigoted and denounced his former pastor's remarks.

The interview broadcast Friday was the first Wright has given since video featuring brief, fiery excerpts of his preaching hit the national scene last month and forced Obama to defend his own spiritual and political views. Wright is scheduled to speak Monday at the National Press Club in Washington.

Sunday night, Wright told an audience of 10,000 at an NAACP dinner that despite what his critics say, he is descriptive, not divisive, when he speaks about racial injustices.

"I describe the conditions in this country," Wright said during the 53rd annual Fight for Freedom Fund Dinner held by the Detroit chapter of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People.

"I'm not here for political reasons," Wright said. "I'm not a politician. I know that fact will surprise many of you because many in the corporate-owned media made it seem like I am running for the Oval Office. I am not running for the Oval Office. I've been running for Jesus a long, long time, and I'm not tired yet."

By speaking at the event, Wright was following in the footsteps of Obama and the senator's rival for the Democratic presidential nomination, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, as well as former President Bill Clinton. It's a $150-a-plate fundraiser billed as America's largest sit-down dinner.

"I am not one of the most divisive" black spiritual leaders, he said. "I'm one of the most descriptive."

Wright received a long, loud standing ovation.

“Rev. Wright has already been framed. Some people may get a greater understanding of him from what he has to say,” but a lot of people have already made up their minds about him, Martin told BlackAmericaWeb.com.

“Politically, you take the hit; you learn from it and move on,” Martin said, but for Obama, that has become more difficult because the issue, which took up most of March, has come back in April and threatens to roll into May.

Martin said the Obama campaign, however, has decided not to further engage the issue.

“They’re not going to comment on it because they don’t have to; (Obama has) already addressed it,” Martin said.

But Rev. Wright, lapel pins, “bitter” working-class white folks all mean bumpkiss to the average voter, said David Bositis, senior analyst for the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies, a black think tank.

Bositis told BlackAmericaWeb.com he didn’t believe that Wright’s interview with Moyers really won’t have much of an impact.

“By and large, no, I don’t because there are real problems” that Americans are contending with, he said.

From Bositis' research, casual conversations and even listening to a recent radio talk show, he said, it is apparent voters “are tired of hearing about lapel pins and Rev. Wright," he said, "and what they are talking about is rice and Costco, how much gasoline costs, how much health care costs, the recession the country is in, people losing their homes and being in neighborhoods where lots of other people are losing their homes, increasing the risk of crime when you have abandoned homes. All this other stuff is a useless distraction to what other people are worried about.”

And while the issue may be framed in terms of how Obama may fair against McCain in November, it is nothing more than a smokescreen to suggest that these issues could cost Obama the Democratic nomination, Bositis said.

“Obama has more delegates, and when everything is done, he’s going to have more delegates, who are going to decide whether to seat Michigan and Florida, and it’s their decision. It’s not the party’s decision; it’s up to the delegation at the Democratic convention. And as long as Obama is in control of the delegation to the convention, he will tell the delegates how to vote, and this is one of the things that Clinton has been sick over,” Bositis said.

The argument that pledged delegates don’t have to vote for the candidate to whom they are pledged is technically true, but virtually impossible to have happen, he said.

“It’s typical of Clinton that she wants to break the rules. Those delegates are not picked at random. They pick the most loyal people to be delegates, and it’s Obama loyalists” who are chosen, Bositis said. “She can make up all the fantasies she wants.”

Bositis said although Clinton won the Pennsylvania primary last Tuesday, she cut Obama’s lead by just three delegates. Superdelegates, he said, are still migrating to Obama’s side.

“She hasn’t gained any ground,” said Bositis.

Bositis and Martin also took political pundits and journalists to task for lazy reporting that has only served to confuse and misinform voters.

Martin, who said he viewed Wright’s sermon in its entirety and pointed out in several interviews that excerpts of Wright’s comments were taken out of context, said few in the media have sought to correct the record, but several commentators have accused him of being an apologist for the minister or a partisan player for Obama.

“I represent fact, I don’t represent factions,” Martin said. “So when somebody says that Wright called for God to damn America, I’ve got to correct them immediately, whether it’s on my radio show or on CNN. Nearly every one of these people coming on the air, none of them has heard the sermon in question. The question is have you heard it? Have you heard it? Have you heard it? And when they say no, you have to say ‘How can you speak with authority on the sermon that you have not heard? You can’t extrapolate.’”

Bositis said he has stopped watching television political pundits because their information is not reliable.

“I can get data on the Web without listening to a bunch of fools. If I want news, I get news from printed sources -- although there are plenty of print sources that are bull -- or on the Web,” he said. “It’s not even informed speculation. Those people are selling themselves. They’re playing roles. They haven’t been hired for analysis. Like local newscasters, (stations) always look for people who are attractive, who come across as trustworthy, who people like. Well, these people are hired to rant and rave.”



Associated Press contributed to this story.

NAACP EXPRESSES OUTRAGE: At unjust ruling in Sean Bell police shooting case


By Richard J. McIntire

The NAACP is expressing its outrage at the verdict issued earlier today by New York State Supreme Court Justice Arthur J. Cooperman in the police shooting death of Sean Bell.

The NAACP demands that the U.S. Department of Justice's Civil Rights Division follow through on its reported monitoring of the case and launch a thorough investigation.

"For us, this case raises the overwhelming concern that New York City Police are often out of control," said New York State Conference NAACP President Hazel N. Dukes. "Where was the threat to the police? There was no need for so many shots to have been fired under the circumstances. The police need to protect and respect our community. The legal system is not living up to justice and fair play. To acquit on all charges is inconceivable and unacceptable. This verdict does not sit well with the NAACP."

The New York State Conference NAACP is planning a Day of Mourning and other reconciliation activities in wake of the verdict.

"This is the latest glaring example of court decisions that appear to endorse legally-sanctioned violence against African Americans," said NAACP Interim General Counsel Angela Ciccolo. "It is high time for all people to wake up and demand an end to senseless violence by police officers against African Americans."

As the court's review of this case tragically illustrates, the statutes that govern the use of deadly force by law enforcement entities are woefully inadequate. As such, the NAACP also calls on Congress to hold hearings on use of force policies and The Law Enforcement Trust and Integrity Act, as crafted by Michigan Rep. John Conyers.

Founded in 1909, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People is the nation's oldest and largest civil rights organization. Its more than half-million adult and youth members throughout the United States and the world are the premier advocates for civil rights in their communities and monitors of equal opportunity in the public and private sectors.

SHARPTON, MARCHERS PROTEST BELL ACQUITTALS IN NY: Rev. Al promised to 'close this city down' after cops go free.



Al Sharpton fired up a group of protesters in Harlem Saturday with promises to "close this city down" following the acquittals of three police detectives who shot and killed an unarmed groom on his wedding day.


"We strategically know how to stop the city so people stand still and realize that you do not have the right to shoot down unarmed, innocent civilians," Sharpton told an overflow crowd of several hundred people at his National Action Network office. "This city is going to deal with the blood of Sean Bell."


According to the AP, Sharpton's rally at his office was followed by a 20-block march down Malcolm X Boulevard and then across 125th Street, where some bystanders yelled out "Kill the police!" Fifty of the marchers carried white placards bearing big black numbers for each of the 50 bullets police fired at Bell and his friends.


Also taking part in the rally was a friend of Bell who was wounded in the 2006 shooting outside a Queens strip club.

"They never accused Sean Bell of doing anything. Then why is he dead?" Sharpton asked, his voice roaring with anger. Authorities "have shown now that they will not hold police accountable. Well, guess what? If you won't, we will!"

"Shut it down! Shut it down!" the crowd chanted, standing up and applauding wildly.

Sitting behind Sharpton as he spoke were Bell's parents, his sister and Nicole Paultre Bell, who took her fiance's name after his death.

"The justice system let me down," Paultre Bell told the crowd in a soft voice. "April 25, 2008: They killed Sean all over again. That's what it felt like to us."

WHITE JENA TEEN PLEADS GUILTY TO HATE CRIME: Jeremiah Munsen, 18, drove past marchers with nooses hanging from his pickup.



A white teen in Jena, Louisiana pleaded guilty Friday to a federal hate crime of threatening and intimidating civil rights marchers last year by displaying hangman’s nooses from the back of a pickup truck.

Federal authorities announced Friday that Jeremiah Munsen, 18, of Grant Parish admitted that he placed two large nooses on his truck Sept. 20 and drove back and forth past a group of marchers gathered at a bus depot in Alexandria — about 35 miles south of Jena, where the marches took place — as they awaited buses to return them to Tennessee.

"The defendant used a noose to threaten peaceful civil rights marchers who were in Louisiana to rally against racial intolerance," said Acting Assistant Attorney General Grace Chung Becker. Munsen, who faces up to a year in prison, will be sentenced at an August 15 hearing.


Marchers were in Jena to protest local authorities who were accused of racial prejudice in the handling of several cases, including the hanging of nooses in a tree after a group of black high school students sat in an area where traditionally only white students sat.


Months later, a white student was allegedly beaten by six black classmates in 2006. The protests that followed were in criticism of local authorities who initially charged the six students dubbed the "Jena 6," with second-degree attempted murder and conspiracy. The charges were later reduced against those involved in the incident.

Friday, April 25, 2008

NY police cleared in 50-bullet wedding day shooting



By Edith Honan

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Three New York City detectives were found not guilty on Friday in the shooting death of an unarmed black man killed in a hail of 50 bullets on his wedding day, prompting angry reactions and a federal review of the case.

A New York state judge cleared two police officers of manslaughter and other charges and a third of reckless endangerment in the death of Sean Bell, 23. Bell was shot, along with two friends, after a bachelor party at a strip club in November 2006.

But federal authorities said they would consider civil rights charges in the case in a review to be conducted by the Justice Department, federal prosecutors and the FBI.

They will "take appropriate action if the evidence indicates a prosecutable violation of federal criminal civil rights statutes," the Justice Department said in a statement.

After the verdict, hundreds of demonstrators yelled angrily, and there was pushing and shoving in the crowd as police, reporters and spectators packed the sidewalk.

Civil rights leader Al Sharpton, who has been highly critical of police and is influential in New York's black community, called for wider protests.

"They want us to act crazy so they would have an excuse to do more," Sharpton told the audience of his radio show. "We are going to be strategic. We are going to close the city down in a nonviolent effective way."

Mayor Michael Bloomberg called for calm after the verdict, saying, "We don't expect violence or law-breaking, nor is there any place for it."

The case had generated outrage in New York's black community, though police said they did not expect violence because numerous demonstrations against the perceived police brutality had remained peaceful.

"It shows that there is no justice in America for the black man. This is telling us the cops can do whatever they want and get away with it," said B.M. Marcus, a community organizer.

APOLOGY

The acquitted officers gave brief statements thanking their friends and family.

"I'd like to say sorry to the Bell family for the tragedy," said detective Marc Cooper, who had been charged only with reckless endangerment.

The other two detectives, Gescard Isnora and Mike Oliver, were charged with manslaughter.

All three defendants waived their right to a jury trial and decided to have the judge decide guilt or innocence. The defense lawyers said jurors in the borough of Queens were likely to be biased against the policemen due to the intense media coverage generated by the case.

State Supreme Court Judge Arthur Cooperman said the charges could not be proved beyond a reasonable doubt, noting that some prosecution witnesses contradicted themselves from prior statements and may have had motivation to lie.

"At times the testimony just didn't make sense," Cooperman said.

After the verdict, loud sobs were heard in the courtroom.

The judge gave credibility to the detectives' statements that they believed they were in danger but also offered, "Questions of carelessness and incompetence must be left to other forums."

The eight-week trial centered on whether the detectives had reason to believe they faced imminent danger and whether they made it clear to Bell and the two survivors that they were police officers.

On the night of the shooting, Isnora, the undercover officer who fired first, followed Bell and his two friends to Bell's car believing they went to fetch a gun to settle a dispute at the club. He opened fire after being grazed by Bell's car as Bell attempted to drive away.

The other officers reached Bell's car after the initial confrontation and said they believed Isnora was being fired at from inside the vehicle.

(Reporting by Edith Honan; Editing by Jackie Frank)

JEREMIAH WRIGHT SPEAKS ON PBS' 'FRONTLINE': Reverend tries to clear up controversy over his sermons.



Tonight, the PBS series "Bill Moyers Journal" will feature the first interview with Sen. Barack Obama's former pastor Rev. Jeremiah Wright of Chicago's Trinity United Church of Christ since controversy erupted over his sermons.


During the hour-long show, the former pastor tells fellow United Church of Christ member Moyers that snippets from his sermons have been taken out of context and offer a faulty picture of his views.


“I think they want to communicate that I am unpatriotic,” Wright says in the interview.


When asked by Moyers his reaction to Obama denouncing the more controversial parts of his sermons, Rev. Wright responded: "It went down very simply. He’s a politician, I’m a pastor. We speak to two different audiences. And he says what he has to say as a politician. I say what I have to say as a pastor. But they’re two different worlds. I do what I do. He does what politicians do. So that what happened in Philadelphia where he had to respond to the soundbites, he responded as a politician.”


Moyers asked: “In the 20 years that you’ve been his pastor, have you ever heard him repeat any of your controversial statements as his opinion?”


Wright anwered: “No. No. No. Absolutely not. I don’t talk to him about politics. And so he had a political event, he goes out as a politician and says what he has to say as a politician. I continue to be a pastor who speaks to the people of God about the things of God.”

Check local listings at www.pbs.org/moyers for the airtime in your area.


Meanwhile, Rev. Wright is scheduled to be the keynote speaker at the NAACP Detroit Branch on Sunday. On Monday, he's due to speak at the National Press Club as part of a divinity conference of black church leaders. The event will be open to all media.







Thursday, April 24, 2008

RACE ABOUT TO BE IN YOUR FACE: It's an issue, angle, tactic and strategy all rolled up in one.




In a report that shows how racism is being ratcheted up in the presidential race, Richard Prince's "Journal-isms," lays out how it's being used by the press.


And of course it comes as no surprise that the Republicans are getting their licks in as well. Put it this way, the right Rev. Jeremiah Wright won't be forgotten any time soon.


The article points out an article the Washington Post by Dana Milbank writing about the declining town of McKeesport, PA:


"On the river bank, Andrew Carnegie's mills have fallen silent. The corrugated metal ones are rusting. An old brick one, from 1906, still says 'National Tube Company.' But the loss of industrial jobs here has turned downtown McKeesport into a place for repo lots and pawnshops ('Cash 'til Payday') and nonprofits caring for the elderly.


"It's enough to make anybody bitter — and some of that is directed at Obama. 'I think he just wants to be president because he's black,' said Tim Hetrick, smoking a cigarette as he waited for a bus among the crumbling structures of downtown McKeesport. A Democrat, he's thinking about voting for McCain in November."


Meanwhile "Journal-isms" quoted MSNBC's report on how the North Carolina GOP is playing the race hard, hard:


"This morning, NBC/NJ's Carrie Dann reports, the North Carolina GOP will unveil a 30-second ad that attacks Democratic gubernatorial candidates Beverly Perdue and Richard Moore for their endorsements of Obama. The ad, per the party, will reference 'controversial figures from Barack Obama's past' and raise the question of the candidates' 'judgment' in supporting him.


"The ad will be unveiled at an 11:00 am press conference. So far, the Democratic gubernatorial campaigns say that they have not yet seen it and declined to comment before knowing the content. But it's anticipated by Democratic bigs in the state that the Rev. Jeremiah Wright will play a starring role."


"Journal-isms" also noted that: "Dann later reported that the Republican National Committee said it had been in contact with the North Carolina GOP, urging it to refrain from running the "Extreme" ad. McCain did the same. However, the ad was introduced anyway."

Read the full piece here.

Wednesday, April 23, 2008

Commentary: Many Poor, Rural Whites Proved the ‘Pennsylvania-as-Alabama’ Theory More Fact than Fiction


By: Tonyaa Weathersbee, BlackAmericaWeb.com

More than 40 years ago, Martin Luther King Jr. had folks like the inhabitants of McKeesport, Pennsylvania pegged.

In his writings and speeches, the civil rights icon outlined how Jim Crow was used as political stratagem by aristocratic whites to suppress unity between poor whites and former slaves; of how it made their stomach rumblings more bearable as long as they didn’t have to eat their meager meals next to a black person. It was a strategy that duped them into seeing black people as the enemy rather than the economic and political realities that were really keeping them down.

If comments from working-class whites like the McKeesport residents regarding Democratic presidential contender Barack Obama are any indication, shades of that strategy is still working.

And it’s both sad and infuriating.

One resident, Edward Norgren, whose economic lifeline was cut when the steel mills near McKeesport were closed in the 1980s, told The Washington Post that he didn’t intend to vote for Obama. But Norgren’s reasons for not supporting him had nothing to do with any reason that could be considered remotely logical; that maybe Obama hadn’t spent enough time in the Senate or that he hasn’t been specific enough on solutions to the problems dogging working-class folks like himself.

His reasons were tinged in racism and ignorance.

Norgren said he didn’t think that Obama was American (Newsflash: To run for president, one has to be born an American citizen.). He also said he didn’t like Michelle’s Obama’s suggestion that she hadn’t been proud of her country –- a remark that right-wing media continues to spin out of proportion.

Another resident, Tim Hetrick, told the Post that he thinks Obama just wants to be president because he’s black.

Someone please tell me: What behind did he pull that explanation out of?

Now, lest I be guilty of stereotyping, I have to say that I don’t believe the views of Norgren and Hetrick reflect the views of all working-class white people. There are good reasons why white people -- and for that matter, many black people -- support Hillary Clinton over Obama, and those reasons may have nothing to do with race.

Yet when one turns to the next chapter -- the one that shows what happens if Obama is the Democratic nominee -- and you see racism written throughout it.

Both Norgren and Hetrick told the Post that if Obama is the nominee, they’ll be voting for Republican John McCain in November. Similar views are also reflected in other polling data.

A Time magazine poll conducted April 2-6 among registered Pennsylvania Democrats showed that if the presidential election was between Clinton and McCain, Clinton would receive 68 percent of their vote, while McCain would receive 16 percent of their vote. But if the contest was between Obama and McCain, Obama would receive 56 percent of that Democratic vote, while McCain would receive 26 percent.

In other words, Clinton supporters are far less likely to support Obama if their candidate isn’t the nominee than vice-versa.

And a chief part of that explanation, to me, has vestiges in Jim Crow.

It’s true that while Jim Crow is largely associated with the South, Pennsylvania also has a similar history of racial animus. Colonial Pennsylvania was a slave-owning society that even attempted to control free blacks, and once blacks began to compete with whites for jobs after the Civil War, they suffered from a huge backlash from poor whites who feared being seen as equal to blacks.

So they drank some concoction akin to the Jim Crow Kool-Aid as well. And it seems that the aftertaste is lingering.

We know this because if working-class whites like Norgren and Hetrick are saying that they’d rather vote for McCain -- a man who plans to continue to drain the economic resources that they need to revitalize their impoverished former steel town for this useless Iraq War -- than Obama, we know this is about racism, not rationality.

And the fact that so many other Pennsylvania Democrats are willing to jump party lines to vote for someone who doesn’t represent their economic self-interests rather than take a chance on a black man illustrates that old fears, and not new hopes, remain a potent persuader in this election season.

Overcoming those fears will likely be Obama’s toughest challenge. All he can hope for is that come November, enough hopeful voters, both black and white, show up at the polls to cancel out the hateful ones.

Clinton Wins Pennsylvania Primary, But Will Her Victory Change the Race’s Dynamic?


By: Michael H. Cottman, BlackAmericaWeb.com

Black political analysts said Tuesday that Hillary Clinton’s victory in the Democratic Pennsylvania primary, while significant for the moment, will still ultimately leave her short of the pledged delegates she needs to secure the Democratic nomination in August.

"Senator Clinton's victory in Pennsylvania in tonight's Democratic primary has provided her with much needed momentum and a somewhat plausible reason to stay in the race," Michelle Bernard, a black conservative, president of the Independent Women’s Voice and a political analyst for MSNBS, told BlackAmericaWeb.com Tuesday.

"Despite her victory in Pennsylvania, it is a mathmatical certainty that Senator Clinton cannot win enough pledged delegates in the reamining primaries to win the Democratic nomination," Bernard said.

"Moving forward, the question for the superdelegates is whether they lend their support to the candidate who has won the vast majority of states and pledged delegates or whether they support the candidate who, after 11 straight losses, won large states like Ohio, Texas, and Pennsylvania, but who is irrefutably behind in pledged delegates," she said.

Clinton gained a victory Tuesday over a better-funded Obama, staving off elimination in their historic race for the Democratic presidential nomination.

The former first lady was winning 55 percent of the vote to 45 percent for her rival with 99 percent of the vote counted, and she hoped for significant inroads into Obama's overall lead in the competition for delegates to the Democratic National Convention.

"It's a long road to 1600 Pennsylvania Ave., and it runs right through the heart of Pennsylvania," she told supporters in Philadelphia. "I'm in this race to fight for you ... You know you can count on me to stand up strong for you every single day in the White House."

According to CNN, Obama racked up margins of more than 90 percent among Pennsylvania's black voters, who are heavily concentrated around Philadelphia. African-Americans made up about 14 percent of Tuesday's vote, and whites made up about 80 percent -- and voted 60-40 for Clinton.

"It seems Senator Clinton has got some wind to her back," Craig Kirby, a Democratic strategist, told BlackAmericaWeb.com. "The next few weeks will bring out the best for both the Democratic party and the nation. I guess folks will really have the opportunity to get to know the superdelegates."

Clinton scored her victory by winning the votes of blue-collar workers, women and white men in an election where the economy was the dominant concern. He was favored by blacks, the affluent and voters who recently switched to the Democratic Party, a group that comprised about one in ten Pennsylvania voters, according to the surveys conducted by The Associated Press.

Peter C. Groff, a Colorado state senator, publisher of Blackpolicy.org and executive director of the Center for African-American Policy at the University of Denver, said "even though Clinton's win is not the biggest win considering how far ahead she was only a month ago, it's still a win and the continuation of a peculiar losing streak for Obama."

"But, he can still claim that he did way better than expected -- you can still argue this either way," Groff told BlackAmericaWeb.com Tuesday night. "It could've been much worse for Obama, particularly in a state that was tailor-made for Clinton."

"It's a win in a large state that is considered a major battleground during the general election," he added. "Therefore, what matters at this stage is how much distance she can go despite being broke, compared to the campaign financing juggernaut that is Senator Obama. It's obvious that he's playing a game of attrition against Clinton, prompting her to spend more money than she has and extending her resources beyond what she's able to sustain."

Roland Martin, a political analyst for CNN, said Clinton needed a big win in Pennsylvania to keep her fund-raising on track.

"The press and the pundits have repeatedly counted Sen. Clinton out, and she has repeatedly proved them wrong," the Clinton campaign said in a statement. "The vote in the bellwether state of Pennsylvania is another head-to-head measure of the two candidates and of the coalition they will put together to compete and win in November."

Donna Brazile, a Democratic political strategist and a superdelegate, said in an appearance on CNN that she will make her decision about Clinton or Obama public in the coming weeks and hopes other superdelegates will decide on a nominee well before the Democratic convention in August.

Brazile said she has already made the choice for president in her "heart" but will wait to announce which candidate she will support in the coming weeks.

Meanwhile, in his speech Tuesday night to supporters in Indiana, Obama said, "After fourteen long months, it’s easy to forget this from time to time -- to lose sight of the fierce urgency of this moment. It’s easy to get caught up in the distractions and the silliness and the tit-for-tat that consumes our politics; the bickering that none of us are immune to, and that trivializes the profound issues -- two wars, an economy in recession, a planet in peril."

"But that kind of politics is not why we’re here," said Obama. "It’s not why I’m here, and it’s not why you’re here. We’re here because of the more than one hundred workers in Logansport, Indiana who just found out that their company has decided to move its entire factory to Taiwan."

Black political observers told BlackAmericaWeb.com Tuesday that Obama appears to have an edge in most of the 10 remaining primaries and will likely split the delegates with Clinton in Pennsylvania, building on his lead with pledged delegates and making it nearly impossible for Clinton to catch up.

Clinton, Martin said on CNN, cannot "trade baskets" with Obama down the stretch.

The former first lady gained at least 28 delegates with her victory, with another 130 still to be awarded.

That left Obama with an overall lead of 1648.5 to 1537.5, totals that include the superdelegates who are not picked in primaries and caucuses.

"As the Democratic primary battle goes on, the candidacies of both Senator Clinton and Obama grow weaker in general election opinion polls," Bernard told BlackAmericaWeb.com. "The biggest winner tonight may in fact be John McCain."


Associated Press contributed to this story.

BILL SAYS OBAMA CAMP 'PLAYED RACE CARD: Then he denies it to MSNBC reporter. Obama responds.



Bill Clinton told a Philadelphia radio station Barack Obama's campaign played the race card to turn black voters against him after he marginalized an Obama win in South Carolina by comparing it to Jesse Jackson's wins there in 1984 and 88.


The day after the interview, as Pennsylvanians headed to the polls, Clinton denied that he ever said it.


In Monday's phone interview with Philadelphia's WHYY radio, Clinton's South Carolina comments were brought up and he was asked if it was a mistake to play the race card.

"No. I think that they played the race card on me. And we now know, from memos from the [Obama] campaign and everything, that they planned to do it all along," Clinton responded.

He went on to explain that his words comparing Obama to Jackson had been twisted and he has been unfairly labeled as a racist. To defend himself, he cited his own appointment of blacks, Hispanics and women to top administration posts during his presidency, his work worldwide to combat AIDS, and reminded the reporter of his office space Harlem.

The next morning in Pittsburgh, Clinton was shaking hands with supporters at the Jewish Community Center when an "embedded reporter" from NBC asked the former President about his WHYY interview the day before. His response is detailed in the transcript below:


NBC: “Sir, what did you mean yesterday when you said that the Obama campaign was playing the race card on you?”
CLINTON: “When did I say that, and to whom did I say that?”
NBC: “On WHYY radio yesterday”
CLINTON: “No, no, no. That’s not what I said. You always follow me around and play these little games, and I’m not going to play your games today. This is a day about election day. Go back and see what the question was, and what my answer was. You have mischaracterized it to get another cheap story to divert the American people from the real urgent issues before us, and I choose not to play your game today. Have a nice day.”
NBC: “Respectfully sir, though, you did say …”
CLINTON: “Have a nice day.” [continues shaking hands with supporters]. I said what I said, you can go and look at the interview. And if you’ll be real honest, you’ll also report what the question was and what the answer was.”
NBC: “They asked you if you regretted your comparing Jesse Jackson to Barack Obama on the day after the South Carolina primary.”
CLINTON: “And I pointed out that I did not do that, and that I complimented them both. And that Jesse Jackson took no offense. And I called him myself, I said, ‘Did you find that offensive?’ And he said no.

Later Tuesday, Obama was asked to respond about Clinton's accusations that his camp used the race card.


"Hold on a second, so former president Clinton dismissed my victory in South Carolina as being similar to Jesse Jackson and he's suggesting that somehow I had something to do with it? Ok, well then you better ask him about it," Obama said.

The Illinois senator was then asked if, as Clinton said, his campaign had a secret plan to use race.

"Was there something that we had a plan to get him to say that my campaign was like Jesse Jackson's? I don't know what he is referring to unfortunately," he said, laughing.

Meanwhile, Clinton is also making news about comments he made immediately after the WHYY interview when he thought the microphone was off. Once the interview was over, he turned to someone next to him and said: “I don’t think I should take any sh** from anybody on that, do you?”

Tuesday, April 22, 2008

It’s All Eyes on Pennsylvania as Voters Head to the Polls for Crucial Democratic Primary


By: Michael H. Cottman, BlackAmericaWeb.com

A day before Tuesday’s crucial Pennsylvania Democratic primary, many African-American voters in the Keystone State say they're poised to support Sen. Barack Obama in his unprecedented journey to become the nation’s first black president.

Michael Days, editor of The Philadelphia Daily News, said the newspaper’s recent polls show Obama has cut Sen. Hillary Clinton’s lead to five percentage points, with a five-percent margin of error.

"One could argue this is a dead heat," Days told BlackAmericaWeb.com Monday. "From what I’m hearing, African-Americans will overwhelmingly support Obama."

Days said Pennsylvania is experiencing record voter registration around the state and in suburban Philadelphia, where Obama has worked hard to court voters who may be more inclined to support Clinton. There is also an unprecedented number of new voters registered in the state.

Days added that many Pennsylvania residents have told reporters they are angry about the current economic climate and impending recession, even though Obama has been criticized for comments he made saying small town Americans are "bitter" and "cling" to guns and religion.

"The bulk of Pennsylvania is made up of small towns, and that’s where the battle is being waged," Days said, adding, "He may do better in Pennsylvania than people expect."

Indeed, even Obama says he wants to keep Tuesday’s race close, but does not expect to win. Ever the unconventional politician, Obama predicted Monday that Clinton would get the critical victory she needs in Tuesday's primary, but said his goal is to keep it close.

"I'm not predicting a win," he told Pittsburgh radio station KDKA. "I'm predicting it's going to be close and that we are going to do a lot better than people expect."

Clinton aides tried to downplay expectations, insisting they would be grateful for a single-digit win. While the New York senator began the race with a hefty 20-point lead in several polls in the state, Obama's extensive campaigning and heavy ad buy have significantly cut into it.

She told supporters in Scranton, "We really need to bear down in these last few days. The whole world is watching."

Michelle Bernard, a black conservative, president of the Washington, D.C.-based Independent Women’s Forum and a political analyst for MSNBC, said Tuesday’s Democratic primary in Pennsylvania could prove to be the resurrection or end of Clinton's presidential bid.

"Recent polls show a margin of difference of approximately five to six points between senators Clinton and Obama," Bernard told BlackAmericaWeb.com Monday. "This difference, which is within the margin of error, coupled with a record increase in Democratic voter registrations in Pennsylvania, could help Senator Obama cut into many of the votes that are presumably going to Senator Clinton, making victories in Indiana and North Carolina even more important to her candidacy. "

Clinton was hoping a big win could boost her chance at the nomination. A loss would increase pressure on her to exit the race, with Obama leading in delegates and the popular vote.

Pennsylvania is the largest of the 10 contests remaining, with about 4 million registered Democrats and 158 delegates up for grabs in the primary.

According to The New York Times, "polls suggest that in the suburbs, Mrs. Clinton is still battling low favorability ratings. It was telling the other day at a forum at Haverford College when she was asked what canvassers should tell voters on her behalf. "Oh, just knock on the door and say, ‘She is really nice,’" Mrs. Clinton said, "or you could say, ‘She is not as bad as you think.’"

Meanwhile, the Clinton campaign Monday unveiled a new TV ad detailing how tough the job of president is and asking voters who they think is ready to step in and handle it. The ad, "Kitchen," is 30 seconds long and includes images of Osama bin Laden.

"It’s the toughest job in the world," the ad says. "You need to be ready for anything -- especially now, with two wars, oil prices skyrocketing and an economy in crisis. Harry Truman said it best: If you can’t stand the heat, get out of the kitchen. Who do you think has what it takes?"

Bill Burton, a spokesman for Obama, told The New York Times, "It’s ironic that she would borrow the president’s tactics in her own campaign and invoke bin Laden to score political points. We already have a president who plays the politics of fear, and we don’t need another."

Both candidates planned final appearances in Pennsylvania's largest urban centers -- Pittsburgh and Philadelphia. Both also had extensive national schedules, taping interviews with all the network morning shows to be aired Tuesday. Clinton also appeared Monday evening on MSNBC's "Countdown" and CNN's "Larry King Live," while Obama appeared on Comedy Central's "The Daily Show."

According to The Washington Post, "The Pennsylvania race has forced Obama to rewrite his script from earlier contests, with the result being a more aggressive tone and style in the final hours of this campaign than had been the case in previous states. Far more than at any other time in the campaign, Obama has applied pressure to Clinton, both on the stump and in his increasingly negative advertising."

But Days told BlackAmericaWeb.com that Obama has energized the electorate in Pennsylvania and he could make it a close contest.

"We’re waiting," he said, "to see how this plays out."


Associated Press contributed to this story.

Pap Smears, HPV Virus Tests Necessary


By: Lauran Neergaard, AP Medical Writer

WASHINGTON - (AP) With apologies to Mark Twain, reports of the death of the Pap smear are premature.

Yes, new research suggests a test for the HPV virus that causes cervical cancer may replace the old-fashioned Pap one day as that cancer's primary screening tool. But even enthusiasts say it will take years of additional research to make such a big switch.

For now, a new trend is the Pap-plus -- both a Pap and an HPV test -- to improve screening accuracy. But government researchers issued a caution this month: Nearly one in 10 women over age 30 who get the combo test learns they have HPV even though their Paps show no cancer or even precancerous cells. They'll need repeat checkups, and maybe more in-depth testing, to tease out who's really at risk.

What makes the issue confusing: Women's bodies very often clear an HPV infection on their own, without lasting harm, but it can take a year. The younger the woman, the more likely that HPV is going to be transient.

"One HPV test does not tell you very much. Two consecutive HPV tests are what you need," says Debbie Saslow of the American Cancer Society, who fields phone calls from women frightened by the test mismatch.

"Right now we're, I think, in quite a state of flux," adds Dr. George Sawaya of the University of California, San Francisco, who worries that women aren't being educated enough about the pros and cons of their test options. "We are very thoughtful in telling them how we believe it can add to their care versus how it may be complicating."

Add the still-to-come impact of the new HPV vaccine, and one thing is clear: The days of simple one-size-fits-all advice on cervical cancer screening are ending -- and women will need to be savvy to realize the newer technology's biggest benefits.

Cervical cancer will strike just over 11,000 U.S. women this year and kill 3,870, the cancer society predicts. Paps are credited for cutting death rates in half since the 1970s, because they can spot precancerous cells in time to remove them and prevent invasive cancer.

HPV, or human papillomavirus, is a common sexually transmitted disease. Some of HPV's dozens of strains can cause cervical cancer if a woman remains infected for a long time -- more than a year, according to research in this month's Journal of the National Cancer Institute. The HPV test is designed to detect most of the worst strains, using the same cells scraped from the cervix as a Pap does, to signal who's at high or low risk.

Neither test is perfect. Paps can miss cancer signs, which is why women are urged to get them every one to three years. Cervical cancer grows so slowly that an abnormality missed at one checkup can still be caught next time.

Also, roughly 4 million of the nation's 60 million annual Paps appear abnormal but not clearly dangerous. An HPV test that finds no virus gives peace of mind that nothing's wrong, a crucial use of that test.

A positive HPV test detects that virus is present, but can't measure duration of infection or actual abnormalities on the cervix, which require more in-depth follow-up testing.

"There's absolutely a tradeoff," says Dr. Diane Solomon of the National Cancer Institute. "There's that balance between wanting to identify ... young women at risk, but not overtreat."

Yet the HPV test's extra sensitivity, casting a wider net for who's at risk, is precisely what has researchers around the world furiously studying it as a potential replacement for the Pap. A list of studies in the last six months have made headlines by finding a stand-alone HPV test more accurate than a Pap at identifying women with cancer or pre-cancer -- almost twice as accurate, in one study.

While that research so far has compared HPV to an older type of Pap, Canada last month began enrolling 33,000 women into a study to compare HPV testing to the liquid-based Paps most common today to see if that makes a difference.

Also, more precise HPV tests, that can pinpoint if women have the one or two most dire strains, are being developed to offer more accuracy.

An extra twist: The HPV test may prove especially useful in poor countries, where cervical cancer still strikes hundreds of thousands of women who have no access to repeat Paps and might benefit more from a less frequent viral check.

However all this research turns out, cancer groups for now stand by their guidelines:

Women under 30 should get a Pap alone. If it's is inconclusive, HPV testing can rule out who needs further examination. A first test should be three years after starting sexual intercourse or at age 21.
Women over 30 have the option of a Pap followed by an HPV test, or a simultaneous Pap-HPV combo. If both are negative, women can wait three years to be tested again.
Women who don't get the HPV test still can wait three years between Paps, if they've had three consecutive clear Paps.
Anyone who's received the new HPV vaccine still must follow guidelines for their age group. That's because the vaccine prevents some but not all HPV strains, and some teens or young women may have been infected already before they were vaccinated.
Stay tuned: The advice is almost certain to change in the next few years.

Paps are "going to be around for the next decade, I will say at least for the next decade," says NCI's Solomon. "But we may not be doing as many Paps in 10 years as we're doing now."