George Zimmerman Trial Livestream

Showing posts with label hillary clinton. Show all posts
Showing posts with label hillary clinton. Show all posts

Monday, December 1, 2008

One Thing for Sure About Hillary: She’s Allergic to Failure



By: Deborah Mathis

My reaction when I first heard that President-Elect Obama was thinking of nominating Hillary Clinton as his secretary of state? A heartfelt, cell-deep, in-my-bones, shiver-inducing cringe.

What, was he nuts? A masochist? A wimp, too conciliatory for his own good? What could possess him to include the junior senator from New York and erstwhile first lady of the United States in his brand spanking new cabinet?

Not known as either a cheerleader or a team player, Hillary Clinton is a shrewd, ambitious, fierce-willed politician who, during the tortured primary season, not only stepped over the line in berating her worthy opponent, but annihilated the thing, handing the Republicans some of their biggest hammers against Obama, including one statement in which she all but said John McCain would be a better choice than the man from Illinois.

And who can forget her long goodbye?

Why in Tarnation would Obama resurrect that old dynamic? Did it hurt so good or something?

Having had several days to digest what is now foregone, I have returned to my senses, and what my faith has told me all along about Obama: He’s nobody’s dummy, nobody’s lackey and nobody’s schmoo. If he thinks Hillary Clinton should be the country’s top diplomat – and fourth in the line of succession – then, as Sarah Palin would say, by golly gee, I betcha he knows what he’s doin'.

I am relieved to report that as of now, with the nomination a fait accompli, I not only no longer cringe, but actually welcome Hillary Clinton as secretary of state-designate. It took me a while to remember an important quality of hers – something I can vouch for, having known and covered her for more than three decades.

Hillary Clinton, like Obama himself, deplores failure. It is her chief allergy, her kryptonite. It foils her and breaks her, sickens her and debilitates her and haunts her (I don’t know that she has ever gotten over the health care reform debacle of 1993 and ’94). Thus, she is driven to succeed.

What’s behind the drive is pure intrigue. Pride, some deep-seated trauma, a need for adulation and acclaim - who knows? What’s important is that this person who is about to inherit, literally, a world of trouble gets up every day unhappy about the state of things; spends every waking moment trying to make the world better; paces and dreams and meets and schemes and works to set things right because it’s just not in her to leave things no better than she found them. Why it’s not in her is moot.

One Thing for Sure About Hillary: She’s Allergic to Failure....

Wednesday, August 27, 2008

Democrats Officially Nominate Barack Obama



By JENNIFER PARKER

Democrats made it official tonight in Denver, when party delegates formally nominated Barack Obama as their 2008 presidential candidate -- the first African American ever nominated by a major party.

The traditional state by state roll call went on until about 6:40 pm eastern, just after the network newscasts went on the air on the east coast.

The roll call included several delegates cast to Sen. Hillary Clinton, whose name was formally put into nomination, even though she did not win the primary battle. By previous agreement by the Obama and Clinton camps, the roll call was halted and Obama was nominated by acclamation.

Democrats Officially Nominate Barack Obama....

Does Her Conciliatory, Unifying Talk Square Hillary – and Bill – with the Black Community?












By: Jackie Jones, BlackAmericaWeb

If there was a question whether Sen. Hillary Clinton would strongly endorse Barack Obama for president, she sought to put that to rest immediately in her address to the Democratic National Convention.

“I am here as a proud mother, a proud Democrat, a proud senator from New York and I am a proud supporter of Barack Obama. Whether you voted for me or you voted for Barack Obama, the time is now to unite as a single party with a single purpose,” Clinton said.

There had been questions right up to the moment Clinton stepped on the stage that she may not be able to convince Democrats that she truly embraced Obama’s candidacy and, more importantly, persuade others to do so.

“Hillary Clinton touched every chord and gave an unequivocal, unqualified endorsement of Obama's candidacy. Talking about women's rights and quoting Sojourner Truth was apt on the anniversary of the passage of the 19th amendment," said Mary Frances Berry, chair of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. "Her suppporters should get the message and forget their discontent and start working."

COMMENTARY....

Clinton calls for Democratic unity



By John Whitesides, Political Correspondent

DENVER (Reuters) - Hillary Clinton delivered a ringing call for Democratic Party unity on Tuesday, promising to work for Barack Obama and challenging her supporters to bury their grudges and rally behind his White House bid.

"Whether you voted for me or voted for Barack, the time is now to unite as a single party with a single purpose," said Clinton in a speech Democrats hope will end a lingering party rift left over from their bitter nominating fight.

Clinton, a New York senator, praised Obama and said Democrats could not sit on the sidelines and watch Republican presidential candidate John McCain take the White House and "squander the promise of our country."

"No way, no how, no McCain. Barack Obama is my candidate and he must be our president," Clinton told a roaring crowd waving a sea of white "Hillary" signs.

Clinton calls for Democratic unity....

Friday, June 27, 2008

Obama, Clinton Pledge a United Front for Campaign



By Kristin Jensen

June 27 (Bloomberg) -- Hillary Clinton said she will devote herself to the election of Barack Obama, her former rival for the Democratic nomination, and asked her supporters to join them in the battle to win the White House.

``We may have started on separate paths, but today our paths have merged,'' Clinton told more than 4,000 people gathered at an outdoor rally in Unity, New Hampshire. ``Today we are coming together for the same goal -- to elect Barack Obama as the next president of the United States.''

The event in the town of 1,700, the first joint campaign appearance by the two candidates since the primaries ended, marked a closing of Democratic ranks behind Obama for the general election campaign against Arizona Senator John McCain, the presumptive Republican nominee. Unity has symbolism beyond its name: in the January New Hampshire primary Obama and Clinton each drew 107 votes there.

``This was a hard-fought primary campaign,'' Clinton said before Obama took the microphone. ``Today and every day going forward we stand shoulder to shoulder.''

Obama, Clinton Pledge a United Front for Campaign....

Tuesday, June 3, 2008

Why America is making history tonight

by Chris Matthews

I think our colleague Ron Allen said it best: “Every time I look at my Blackberry, it seems another superdelegate has gone over to Barack Obama.”

It’s been exactly five months to the day since voters in Iowa went to the polls on January 3 and opened the primary and caucus season. Tonight, South Dakota and Montana close the curtain on the voting. No more caucuses, no more primaries.

There are two big questions for tonight. The first is, will Obama win enough delegates tonight to win the Democratic nomination?

The second big question, what will Hillary Clinton do? Will she bow tonight to the impossible math confronting her or will she keep on fighting at least for a few more days? And of course, if and when Hillary does get out, will she press for number two? Late today, the Associated Press reported she told Democrats, “I am open to it.”

COMMENTARY....

Thursday, May 15, 2008

Young staffers talk about anti-black sentiment on campaign trail; GA restaurant blasted for selling Obama/Curious George t-shirt.


The Washington Post recently featured an article about young campaign supporters of the Democratic candidate who encountered racist attitudes and anti-black sentiment while working in small, rural, white towns across Indiana, Pennsylvania and Ohio – all states won by Sen. Hillary Clinton in the primaries.


In the factory town of Muncie, Ind., Danielle Ross and her cohorts were soliciting support for Barack Obama at malls, on street corners and in a Wal-Mart parking lot. "The first person I encountered was like, 'I'll never vote for a black person,'" recalled Ross, a onetime university student who is white and just turned 20. "People just weren't receptive."


The Post article continues:


...Doors have been slammed in their faces. They've been called racially derogatory names (including the white volunteers). And they've endured malicious rants and ugly stereotyping from people who can't fathom that the senator from Illinois could become the first African American president. The contrast between the large, adoring crowds Obama draws at public events and the gritty street-level work to win votes is stark. The candidate is largely insulated from the mean-spiritedness that some of his foot soldiers deal with away from the media spotlight.


Victoria Switzer, a retired social studies teacher, was on phone-bank duty one night during the Pennsylvania primary campaign. One night was all she could take: "It wasn't pretty." She made 60 calls to prospective voters in Susquehanna County, her home county, which is 98 percent white. The responses were dispiriting. One caller, Switzer remembers, said he couldn't possibly vote for Obama and concluded: "Hang that darky from a tree!"

ENTIRE ARTICLE....

Commentary: Race Card? The Only One on the Table is the White Supremacy Card – and Clinton Played It



By: Gregory Kane, BlackAmericaWeb.com

Ah, I love the smell of Democrats playing the race card in the morning!

The Democrat in this case? Why, Sen. Hillary Clinton of New York, now in Week Two of her realization that she doesn’t get the Democratic presidential nomination handed to her just because her last name is Clinton.

Clinton trails Sen. Barack Obama in the number of superdelegates and regular delegates. Some political observers have noted that she has no chance of winning the nomination, but she’s vowed to stay in the race until the bitter end. Many have asked why, and the answer may have come last week, when African-American columnist Richard Prince wrote about what Clinton said regarding the West Virginia primary.

ENTIRE COMMENTARY....

Wednesday, May 14, 2008

As Expected, Clinton Wins West Virginia Primary, Says She’s ‘More Determined Than Ever’



By: Michael H. Cottman and Jackie Jones, BlackAmericaWeb.com

Black political observers said Tuesday that despite Hillary Clinton’s convincing but largely symbolic victory in the West Virginia primary, Barack Obama is still on track to become the nation’s first African-American Democratic presidential nominee.

"Barack Obama’s decision to move on to the general election is his signal that the nomination is his, and it's time to move on without saying it," Peter C. Groff, a Colorado state senator, publisher of Blackpolicy.org and executive director of the Center for African-American Policy at the University of Denver, told BlackAmericaWeb.com Tuesday.

"It is a great political move and allows the party to advance, but also allows Hillary Clinton to phase out her effort," Groff said. "The move also allows him to test fall themes and messages before the American people tune in."

ARTICLE....

Friday, May 9, 2008

The Hutchinson Report: Racially-Polarized Democratic Party Now a Far Greater Peril to Obama and Clinton


By: Earl Ofari Hutchinson

Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama’s divvy-up of North Carolina and Indiana between them further deepens the two perils the Democrats face. One is that neither heavy hitter can deliver the knockout punch that the Democrats desperately need to get on with the business of mounting a united front against John McCain. The other is the much-talked and much-worried-about peril of a divided party and what that means.

There are two big reasons that preordained that the Democrats would find themselves in this muddled, confused and frustrating danger. The Democrats’ winner-not-take-all proportional delegate system and the system of superdelegates that they dumped onto the primaries was a prescription for disaster. The idea behind this was to bring democracy with a small d to the vote process and snatch the decision about who gets the big prize out of deal-making party bosses at the national convention. This supposedly would insure a smooth, happy-faced party convention and a coronation for the party’s pick.

READ COMMENTARY....

Tuesday, May 6, 2008

Democrats Plunder Their Own Nomination

By Leila Khaled
Bronzeville Metropolis

The Super Delegates are getting nervous and growing increasingly afraid on a daily basis.

They're going to have to award the Democrat nomination to either Hillary Clinton or Barack or Obama.

And in doing so, they'll rob the other of a chance to be president. Obama leads in delegate count, but Hillary has won the key swing states.

Last Friday, conservative talk-radio host Rush Limbaugh put those fears to rest, discussing why Democrat leadership has no reason to fear losing the black vote if they take the nomination away from Obama and give it to Hillary:

President John Kennedy and his brother Robert Kennedy wiretapped Dr. King. Black voters stayed with Democrats. Democrats stood in the schoolhouse doors vowing, "Segregation forever!"

Democrats voted against landmark civil rights legislation; Republicans passed it. Blacks stayed with Democrats.

Bull Connor was a Democrat. Blacks stayed with Democrats.

Democrats created the welfare state, destroying millions of black families. Blacks stayed with Democrats.

Democrats bent over forward for the teachers unions, ruining public education for generations of black kids; leaving them unequipped to participate as equals in American society. Yet! Black voters stayed with Democrats.

Democrats urged the early release of criminals to further prey on law-abiding black citizens. Blacks stayed with Democrats.

Democrats threw blacks under the bus during the immigration debate.

After Rosa Parks finally moved to the front of the bus, Democrats threw blacks under it during the immigration debate because Hispanics are now the largest minority voting bloc. Blacks stayed with Democrats. Democrats have not supported blacks achieving power.

It's not that anyone is implying blacks are not intelligent. They've just been lied to by Democrats and made to believe they have no choice. Limbaugh explains:

For 50 years, black people in this country have been told by elected Democrats that Republicans and conservatives are racists, sexists, bigots, and homophobes; that they have no desire for them to become equal or progress economically -- and then you couple that with ministers like Farrakhan and Jeremiah Wright reinforcing what other black leaders like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson do, and it all becomes very simple. They have been scared to death. Black voters have been told for 50 years that their lives will be ruined if they vote for Republicans, because Republicans don't care about them. When you vote out of fear, it's the same thing the Democrats have done with elderly people, our seasoned citizens and Social Security. It's almost predictable that every election cycle, the Democrats will predict or tell old people that Republicans want to take back their Social Security.

It's called Plantation Mentality. As he writes in his book, "It's OK To Leave The Plantation," C. Mason Weaver says Democrats are the new "slave owners." Black Democrat leaders are the "master slaves" and black Democrat voters are "slaves." Plantation mentality is a system that discourages independence and character and encourages reliance on masters or appointed tribal chiefs in our community.

Democrat leaders have long understood that the more money people have control over, the less need they have for liberal government programs. Hence, we see 50 years of lies by Democrats to blacks and it has been most effective. One government program after another, blacks have historically been afraid to vote against the "master slave" and "slave owner." Regardless of this year's nominee, history is bound to repeat itself.

Monday, May 5, 2008

Guam Picks Obama by Razor-Thin Margin; Spotlights Turn Toward Indiana, North Carolina



By: Michael H. Cottman, BlackAmericaWeb.com

For presidential candidates Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, Tuesday’s closely-watched primaries in North Carolina and Indiana are crucial contests that could determine who becomes the Democratic nominee to take on Republican John McCain in November.

Obama squeaked out a victory Saturday in the Guam primary by seven votes -- 2,264 votes to 2,257. The tiny but significant U.S. island territory handed Obama a victory, which increased his lead over Clinton with pledged delegates, now standing at 1,493 to 1,334, in a campaign where every delegate will count.

Obama has also tied Clinton at 97 for the number of supporters on Capitol Hill among Democratic legislators, and he now trails Clinton by only 19 super delegates.

David Bositis, senior analyst for the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies, told BlackAmericaWeb.com that for all of Clinton’s efforts, she’s essentially running in place.

Wednesday, April 23, 2008

Clinton Wins Pennsylvania Primary, But Will Her Victory Change the Race’s Dynamic?


By: Michael H. Cottman, BlackAmericaWeb.com

Black political analysts said Tuesday that Hillary Clinton’s victory in the Democratic Pennsylvania primary, while significant for the moment, will still ultimately leave her short of the pledged delegates she needs to secure the Democratic nomination in August.

"Senator Clinton's victory in Pennsylvania in tonight's Democratic primary has provided her with much needed momentum and a somewhat plausible reason to stay in the race," Michelle Bernard, a black conservative, president of the Independent Women’s Voice and a political analyst for MSNBS, told BlackAmericaWeb.com Tuesday.

"Despite her victory in Pennsylvania, it is a mathmatical certainty that Senator Clinton cannot win enough pledged delegates in the reamining primaries to win the Democratic nomination," Bernard said.

"Moving forward, the question for the superdelegates is whether they lend their support to the candidate who has won the vast majority of states and pledged delegates or whether they support the candidate who, after 11 straight losses, won large states like Ohio, Texas, and Pennsylvania, but who is irrefutably behind in pledged delegates," she said.

Clinton gained a victory Tuesday over a better-funded Obama, staving off elimination in their historic race for the Democratic presidential nomination.

The former first lady was winning 55 percent of the vote to 45 percent for her rival with 99 percent of the vote counted, and she hoped for significant inroads into Obama's overall lead in the competition for delegates to the Democratic National Convention.

"It's a long road to 1600 Pennsylvania Ave., and it runs right through the heart of Pennsylvania," she told supporters in Philadelphia. "I'm in this race to fight for you ... You know you can count on me to stand up strong for you every single day in the White House."

According to CNN, Obama racked up margins of more than 90 percent among Pennsylvania's black voters, who are heavily concentrated around Philadelphia. African-Americans made up about 14 percent of Tuesday's vote, and whites made up about 80 percent -- and voted 60-40 for Clinton.

"It seems Senator Clinton has got some wind to her back," Craig Kirby, a Democratic strategist, told BlackAmericaWeb.com. "The next few weeks will bring out the best for both the Democratic party and the nation. I guess folks will really have the opportunity to get to know the superdelegates."

Clinton scored her victory by winning the votes of blue-collar workers, women and white men in an election where the economy was the dominant concern. He was favored by blacks, the affluent and voters who recently switched to the Democratic Party, a group that comprised about one in ten Pennsylvania voters, according to the surveys conducted by The Associated Press.

Peter C. Groff, a Colorado state senator, publisher of Blackpolicy.org and executive director of the Center for African-American Policy at the University of Denver, said "even though Clinton's win is not the biggest win considering how far ahead she was only a month ago, it's still a win and the continuation of a peculiar losing streak for Obama."

"But, he can still claim that he did way better than expected -- you can still argue this either way," Groff told BlackAmericaWeb.com Tuesday night. "It could've been much worse for Obama, particularly in a state that was tailor-made for Clinton."

"It's a win in a large state that is considered a major battleground during the general election," he added. "Therefore, what matters at this stage is how much distance she can go despite being broke, compared to the campaign financing juggernaut that is Senator Obama. It's obvious that he's playing a game of attrition against Clinton, prompting her to spend more money than she has and extending her resources beyond what she's able to sustain."

Roland Martin, a political analyst for CNN, said Clinton needed a big win in Pennsylvania to keep her fund-raising on track.

"The press and the pundits have repeatedly counted Sen. Clinton out, and she has repeatedly proved them wrong," the Clinton campaign said in a statement. "The vote in the bellwether state of Pennsylvania is another head-to-head measure of the two candidates and of the coalition they will put together to compete and win in November."

Donna Brazile, a Democratic political strategist and a superdelegate, said in an appearance on CNN that she will make her decision about Clinton or Obama public in the coming weeks and hopes other superdelegates will decide on a nominee well before the Democratic convention in August.

Brazile said she has already made the choice for president in her "heart" but will wait to announce which candidate she will support in the coming weeks.

Meanwhile, in his speech Tuesday night to supporters in Indiana, Obama said, "After fourteen long months, it’s easy to forget this from time to time -- to lose sight of the fierce urgency of this moment. It’s easy to get caught up in the distractions and the silliness and the tit-for-tat that consumes our politics; the bickering that none of us are immune to, and that trivializes the profound issues -- two wars, an economy in recession, a planet in peril."

"But that kind of politics is not why we’re here," said Obama. "It’s not why I’m here, and it’s not why you’re here. We’re here because of the more than one hundred workers in Logansport, Indiana who just found out that their company has decided to move its entire factory to Taiwan."

Black political observers told BlackAmericaWeb.com Tuesday that Obama appears to have an edge in most of the 10 remaining primaries and will likely split the delegates with Clinton in Pennsylvania, building on his lead with pledged delegates and making it nearly impossible for Clinton to catch up.

Clinton, Martin said on CNN, cannot "trade baskets" with Obama down the stretch.

The former first lady gained at least 28 delegates with her victory, with another 130 still to be awarded.

That left Obama with an overall lead of 1648.5 to 1537.5, totals that include the superdelegates who are not picked in primaries and caucuses.

"As the Democratic primary battle goes on, the candidacies of both Senator Clinton and Obama grow weaker in general election opinion polls," Bernard told BlackAmericaWeb.com. "The biggest winner tonight may in fact be John McCain."


Associated Press contributed to this story.

Monday, April 21, 2008

Undecided Superdelegates in Upcoming Primary States ‘Hedging Their Bets,’ Observers Say


By: Sherrel Wheeler Stewart and Jackie Jones, BlackAmericaWeb.com

Rep. Joe Donnelly of Granger, Indiana is one of four Democratic representatives from the state undecided in their roles as superdelegates.

“I am going to wait and let my district vote before making an endorsement,” Donnelly told BlackAmericaWeb.com. “I am one of them.”

Voters in Indiana go to the polls on May 6 for the state's presidential primary.

Donnelly said he will make his endorsement based on who he thinks will make the “best president for this country and who is supported by a majority of voters in my district.”

The congressman said he has been contacted by both the campaigns of both Democratic hopefuls, Sen. Barack Obama and Sen. Hillary Clinton. “I’ve explained to them my position, and both camps have been understanding,” Donnelly said.

He is currently facing a re-election bid to represent Indiana’s Second district.

In November, Donnelly said, the Democrats will carry Indiana. “The important issues in Indiana are those that relate to working families,” he said. “Both candidates are speaking to those issues.”

Donnelly said his endorsement decision will not be influenced by the outcome of Tuesday’s Pennsylvania primary.

Just as there are undecided superdelegates in states such as Indiana, there are also a considerable number of undecided voters, some polls show.

A Times/Bloomberg poll conducted in Indiana April 10-14 showed that 19 percent of the likely Democratic voters in that state are undecided. That same poll showed Obama leading in that state with 35 percent of the vote. Clinton polled at 30 percent.

In North Carolina, a state where voters also go to the polls May 6, a Times/Bloomberg poll there also showed a double-digit percentage of undecided voters. Obama leads in that state with 47 percent, and Clinton follows with 34 percent, but 17 percent of the likely Democratic voters still were undecided in the poll conducted April 10-14.

But observers say the most critical votes among the undecided ultimately may come from Democratic superdelegates like Donnelly, who are hedging their bets on the march to the nomination.

The approximately 795 superdelegates -- party leaders and elected official delegates -- constitute about a fifth of all delegates who vote for a nominee at the convention. They are unpledged delegates who are free to support whomever they choose. According to Politico.com, Clinton leads Obama in superdelegates, 254-233, but 246 are still undecided. The total does not include superdelegates who committed to other Democratic candidates who have dropped out of the race, including former North Carolina Sen. John Edwards, whose endorsement is actively being sought by the remaining candidates.

“They are very wary about who they’re going to vote for and will want to see what happens," says Dr. Ron Walters, director of the African-American Leadership Center and professor of Government and Politics at the University of Maryland College Park, said of the undecided superdelegates. "They don’t want to be caught on the wrong side of the fence. Some have made up their minds and are part of a strategy. These are the Obama people. They’re sort of trickling out in a way that creates momentum and feeling that not only closes the gap, but shows the momentum is clearly going toward him. There’s another group that wants to be on the winning side.”

Some superdelegates who are elected officials will ultimately follow the will of their constituents, but are hedging their bets in case Clinton wins. They don’t want to declare support for the wrong candidate and then have to try to make amends with the nominee -- and, possibly, the president -- when they need favors.

“They have brownie points,” Walters told BlackAmericaWeb.com. “If they want something from someone who is president, down the line, they can say ‘I came out for you.’”

“I can tell you right now the Clinton folks, they’ve got a marker on when somebody committed,” Democratic strategist Craig Kirby told BlackAmericaWeb.com. “There’s a difference between deciding in March ’08 and in May ’08. It’s the difference between being ambassador to England and ambassador to West Virginia. And I’ve got nothing against West Virginia.”

Even a high-profile personality like ex-candidate Edwards stands to gain from endorsing earlier rather than later.

“John Edwards could have come out much earlier,” Walters said. “By waiting, his potency loses its effectiveness in the campaign. It doesn’t take much courage to come out once this thing is decided.”

Before the Texas and Ohio primaries, Walters said, about 50 superdelegates were ready to cross the line en masse and announce their support for Obama.

“In Texas, [Clinton] was able to say to them, ‘Hold on, I’m not out of this thing,’” he said. “That sort of checkmated that move,” but Clinton is still seeing defections from her camp. Those 50 superdelegates, Walters said, may be down to as few as 30.

It is critical, he said, that the nomination be wrapped up well before the convention in August. A brokered convention would create the image that the Democratic Party is disorganized and allow the presumptive GOP nominee, John McCain, more time to campaign without particularly close scrutiny.

“To have a mess at the convention is to jeopardize the fall campaign. It should be wrapped up by late June or early July at the rules committee where they certify the delegates,” Walters said.

“The convention is the nominee’s convention, and it has to be done according to the nominee’s wishes,” Walters said. “It’s much easier to shape the convention with one party and set everything up according to the way the nominee wants to campaign.”

Thursday, April 17, 2008

Obama Hammered, Clinton Digs Deeper in Debate Six Days Before Pivotal Pennsylvania Vote



By: Michael H. Cottman and Nia Meeks, BlackAmericaWeb.com

For Ruth Faber, who has worked in the cafeteria at Lincoln University outside Philadelphia for the past 30 years, her decision to support Barack Obama for president boiled down to dollars and cents.

"I’m for Obama because he’s for us," Faber told BlackAmericaWeb.com Wednesday while watching the presidential debate at Philadelphia's grand National Constitution Center between Obama and Hillary Clinton on television with about 150 students and staff at Lincoln University, one of the nation’s oldest black colleges.

The debate, held six days before next Tuesday's pivotal primary elections in Pennsylvania, had the event's attendees rapt at some moments, irritated at others, but most certainly engaged throughout the night.

Faber, who is from Lancaster, Pennsylvania and works 12-hour shifts, supports Obama, she said, because the Illinois senator stands up for "everyday working people, people hoping they can get overtime to make ends meet, who turn off the electric so the bills won’t be so high." She was surprised, she said, to see such a large student turnout at the debate watch party.

Rick Connor, 20, a chemistry major from Odenton, Maryland, said it was important for students to watch the debate and form their own opinions about who should occupy the White House and lead the nation next year.

"The country is in a recession, and its important for students to get involved and know the direction of our country," Connor told BlackAmericaWeb.com.

Jehmu Green, one of the founders of Rock The Vote, also attended the event and said she is supporting Clinton.

"People look to someone with experience," Green told BlackAmericaWeb.com, "someone who will make them feel safe."

Wednesday night's debate -- the 21st of the election season -- came as Obama faced increased criticism for telling a group of San Francisco donors, in response to a question about Pennsylvanians in small towns far from the state's urban hubs, that some of those small-town voters are bitter over lost jobs and, as a result, "cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them."

The debate's moderators -- ABC News' Charles Gibson and George Stephanopolous, the former White House communications director under Bill Clinton -- raised the subject early in the debate -- as they did Obama's relationship with his former pastor, Rev. Jeremiah Wright, and whether or not Obama wore a flag pin on his lapel -- putting him on the defensive early. He suggested in his response that exploiting such "distracting" issues in the midst of America's economic downturn and rising foreclosure rates did not serve the public's interest -- or even interest the public.

"For us to be obsessed with these kinds of errors I think is a mistake," Obama said.

The night's first dramatic moment came when Clinton and Obama both declined to pledge a spot on their ticket to the loser of their epic battle for the Democratic presidential nomination, prompted by a question from Gibson and proceded by laughter from the audience before Obama's reply.

"I think very highly of Senator Clinton's record, but I think it is premature at this point to talk about who the vice presidential candidates will be because we're still trying to determine who the nominee will be," Obama said.

Clinton's take? "I'm going to do everything I possibly can to make sure that one of us takes the oath of office next January. I think that has to be the overriding goal," she said.

On his remarks in San Francisco, Obama maintained that he was attempting to say that because voters feel ignored by government, "they end up being much more concerned about votes around things like guns where traditions have been passed on from generation to generation. And those are incredibly important to them."

But Clinton, who has called Obama's statements "elitist" and "condescending" and has run ads in Pennsylvania playing up the comments, once again criticized him.

"People don’t cling to their traditions on hunting and guns" out of frustration with their government, Clinton said. She added that Obama had a fundamental misunderstanding on the role of religion and faith, and he pointed mentioned in his reply, "I am a person of faith."

On Wright, Clinton reiterated that the Wright "would not have been her pastor," and called the issue a "legitimate area … for people to be exploring."

She admitted that she made a mistake when asked about her erroneous statement that she had braved sniper fire during a landing in Bosnia as first lady in 1996.

"I may be a lot of things, but I am not dumb," Clinton said, adding that she had written in her book, "Living History," that there had been no fire during the event. She apologized for the statements, saying that she had "said some things that weren't in keeping with what I knew to be the case."

Asked whether Obama could defeat likely Republican nominee John McCain in November, Clinton at first sidestepped. Asked a second time, she replied, "Yes, yes, yes." Asked an identical question, Obama said, "Absolutely, and I've said so before" -- a not-so-subtle response to frequent claims by Clinton's aides that he could lead the Democrats to defeat in the fall.

The candidates also discussed health care, Iraq, the Bush administration, gun control, and both pledged not to raise taxes.

Reaction to the ABC debate was mixed. Obama "did not have a good night," said Chuck Todd of NBC News. But Mark Halperin of Time magazine said Obama was "well prepared and focused." Groff said it was a relatively uneventful debate, which actually played to Obama's benefit.

"The big story of the night is how ABC News poorly managed this debate," said Peter C. Groff, a Colorado state senator, publisher of Blackpolicy.org and executive director of the Center for African-American Policy at the University of Denver. "What was frustrating is that they spent half the debate discussing the sensational topics in the campaign. Even more frustrating were the commercial breaks. Charlie Gibson and George Stephanopolous were clearly much more interested in the 'Paris Hiltonization' of this campaign rather than the substance."

Obama definitely hit the "bitterness" issue right out of the gate, Groff said.

"Through this so-called 'gaffe' at the San Francisco fundraiser, Obama's now stumbled into the number-one issue of the campaign: The economy," he said. "There's an opportunity for him to dominate that discussion and move it to the forefront. As Iraq begins to fade from the scene, it's more about the economy. Sen. Clinton has been so busy trying to take him down and find a chink in his armor that she lost the opportunity to move along with him on that."

"Sen. Clinton appeared on the attack early in the exchange," Groff told BlackAmericaWeb.com, "but at a certain point, she backed off. A lot of time was wasted on the intangibles when we're more interested in the policy platforms. You're sitting there thinking about how people are losing their homes, about to pay four bucks a gallon for gas this summer, struggling with inflated food prices and other challenges, and this is all that ABC can muster -- spending 46 minutes on Jeremiah Wright, a lapel pin and a lie on Bosnia."

Obama campaign manager David Plouffe sent an e-mail to reporters after the debate saying that Clinton continued her campaign strategy of misdirection.

"Tonight we saw a real choice between the old politics of point-scoring and distraction and a politics that focuses on bringing us together to actually solve the challenges we talk about every single election," Plouffe said. "Continuing the theme of her campaign, Senator Clinton used every single opportunity she had to launch misleading attack after misleading attack against Barack Obama, which is why polls show that most Americans think she’s running the most negative campaign and don’t believe she’s trustworthy."

Earlier in the day Wednesday, Obama picked up three key endorsements from super-delegates from North Carolina and Indiana, which hold Democratic primaries May 6. North Carolina representatives Mel Watt of Charlotte and David Price of Chapel Hill announced their support for Obama. Rep. Andre Carson of Indianapolis also said he’s supporting Obama. Carson, 33, won a special election in March and is filling the House seat of Rep. Julia Carson, his grandmother, who died Dec. 17.

Craig Kirby, a Democratic political strategist, told BlackAmericaWeb.com that, in his opinion, Obama was withstood Clinton’s ongoing assault.

"It seems Senator Obama's strategy of building a new coalition to defeat the traditional ways of Washington is working," Kirby said. "He was attacked and attacked -- yet he held to his beliefs. This is what the American people are seeing. And this why his [poll] numbers continue to increase."

---

Associated Press contributed to this story.

Wednesday, April 16, 2008

What Needs to Happen in Tonight’s Debate to Push Either Obama or Clinton Over the Top?



By: Michael H. Cottman, BlackAmericaWeb.com

One day before a high-stakes debate in Philadelphia between Democratic presidential candidates Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, one thing is certain: The gloves are off.

The Clinton campaign’s strategy is to keep the pressure on and "bloody" Obama in the weeks ahead, Bill Murrain, a lawyer and longtime political observer, told BlackAmericaWeb.com.

Obama seemed to agree with Murrain’s assessment, acknowledging this week how brutal the campaign has become heading into the Wednesday debate and beyond.

"I have tried to figure out how to show restraint and make sure that, during this primary contest, we're not damaging each other so badly that it's hard for us to run in November," Obama said at a media luncheon this week sponsored by The Associated Press.

"I'm sure that Senator Clinton feels like she's doing me a great favor, because she's been deploying most of the arguments that the Republican Party will be using against me in November," said Obama, "and so, it's toughening me up. And I'm getting a run through the paces here."

[During the media luncheon, AP Chairman Dean Singleton questioned Obama about Afghanistan, where "Obama bin Laden is still at large." "I think that was Osama bin Laden," Obama responded.]

Wednesday’s debate comes during the so-called "bitter" debate -- where Obama has been criticize by Clinton for talking down to small-town blue-collar workers. The Clinton campaign released a new television ad Monday referring to Obama’s remarks. Obama countered with an ad of his own Tuesday.

Obama has clarified his comments repeatedly over the past few days after a San Francisco fundraiser where he suggested working class people are "bitter" about their economic circumstances and "cling to guns and religion" as a result. Clinton has used what Obama has characterized as a misstatement to peg him as "condescending" and "elitist."

Most political analysts agree that Clinton -- or the moderators -- will likely raise the issue during the debate.

"I'm not so sure Obama needs to deflect questions about this controversy during Wednesday's debate," Peter C. Groff, a Colorado state senator, publisher of Blackpolicy.org and executive director of the Center for African-American Policy at the University of Denver, told BlackAmericaWeb.com.

"There is a grand opportunity here to stick to his talking points on the economy, to present what makes his plan stronger," Groff said. "Here, he can discuss the need to rally people into a cause that motivates Washington to do things differently. What he needs to talk about is that during the course of this campaign, he is talking to people and is aware of their frustrations. The issue is not whether people are bitter or angry; the issue is whether or not government has been responsive to their needs during times of economic crisis over the past three decades."

Groff said he believes small towns in rural areas are frustrated and bitter about a whole array of economic challenges.

"Senator Obama has picked up on that sort of frustration during the course of this campaign and tapped into it -- which is underscored by the type of enthusiasm generated by his candidacy," Groff added. "When examining the entire quote, one finds that it is appropriate and cogent within the context of the question that was asked: How do you effectively reach out to 'blue collar voters?"

Craig Kirby, a Democratic political strategist, agreed with Groff, telling BlackAmericaWeb.com that Obama should continue to focus on the core issues of his campaign because "the desperation of Senator Clinton is now showing."

Michelle Bernard, a black conservative, president of the Washington, D.C.-based Independent Women’s Voice and a political analyst for MSNBC, will be watching the debate closely.

"In order to win [Wednesday’s] Democratic debate, Senator Obama must prove himself to be as facile a debater as he is an orator," Bernard told BlackAmericaWeb.com Tuesday. "While it is imperative that he continue to show the American public who he is and why he believes that he is an agent of change, he must also be facile and nimble in his handling of questions related to what our nation’s domestic and foreign policy would like in an Obama administration."

Initial indications are that Obama’s remarks have not worked against him. A new Gallup Poll shows Obama continuing to hold a solid lead over Clinton in national Democratic voters’ support for the presidential nomination, 50 percent to her 41 percent.

In Pennsylvania, Clinton still leads Obama by about five points, according to most polls, but Obama has cut deeply into Clinton’s 26-point lead. Obama remains more popular among the state's black voters, 75 percent to 17 percent, and Clinton does better among whites, 56 percent to 38 percent. As in past surveys, Clinton leads among older voters, and Obama leads among younger ones.

Wednesday’s debate, airing live at 8 p.m. on ABC, comes a less than a week before the April 22 Pennsylvania primary. ABC News anchor Charles Gibson and chief Washington correspondent George Stephanopoulos will moderate.

"The stakes, at least for Senator Clinton couldn’t be higher," Stephanopoulos told reporters. "Pennsylvania has become a must-win."

Meanwhile, a day before a critical face-off with Clinton in Philadelphia, the Obama campaign is hoping the "bitter" issue will not distract Pennsylvania voters from Obama’s central message of hope and change.

"I regret some of the words I chose, partly because the way that these remarks have been interpreted have offended some people and partly because they've served as one more distraction from the critical debate that we must have in this election," Obama said at the media luncheon. "But I will never walk away from the larger point that I was trying to make and have made in the past."

Thursday, March 13, 2008

THE HUTCHINSON REPORT: Black Voters Can’t Put Obama in the White House.


By Earl Ofari Hutchinson

African-American voters will help insure that Democratic presidential contender Barack Obama keeps his slight edge over Hillary Clinton—for now. They will not help him beat John McCain if he eventually gets the Democratic nomination.

Yet it’s still a virtual article of political faith that a strong, united, and crusading black vote can tip the scale for a Democratic presidential candidate. This is a myth and it’s risky business for Obama and the Democrats to believe that.


It’s easy to see why Obama might be tempted to think that. When Obama needed a surge early on in the campaign, he called on Oprah, and she delivered. She made a blatant racial pitch for blacks to in the crucial South Carolina primary to vote for him, and they did in near record numbers. That put him over the top and propelled his campaign.


With the black vote firmly in hand, that gave him the freedom to craft his hope and change message in broad, bland, and especially non-racial terms. The idea was to avoid any appearance of a Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton racial tilt. That would be the political kiss of death with many white voters.


But that didn’t change the political reality that black votes still provided the decisive edge for Obama in key primary state wins. And even in his losses to Hillary Clinton in Ohio, California and Texas, black votes kept the race close. Those votes, though, will never be enough to put him over the top in the big states against Clinton, let alone against John McCain in the South and Border states.


The myth that the black vote wins presidential election has been bandied about for so long that it’s taken on the proportion of a political urban legend. In 2000, black voters made up nearly 11 percent of the overall voter. They gave the Democratic presidential contender Al Gore 90 percent of their vote. In 2004, black voters made up nearly 12 percent of the vote and gave Democratic presidential contender John Kerry 88 percent of the vote. Gore and Kerry lost.


The Clinton wins in 1992 and 1996 also helped fuel the myth that black votes put Democrats in the White House. Clinton managed to pry four Southern states out of the GOP orbit but he did it by downplaying racial and social issues and stressing family values, tough defense, and a strong economy. He got lots of white votes, especially, white male votes, and that made the difference since he got the same percentage of black votes that Democrats traditionally got in prior elections.


In 2004, then presidential contender Howard Dean openly worried that Democrats could not beat Bush unless they got a bigger share of white male votes. He quipped that the Democrats had to court beer-guzzling white guys who wave the Confederate flag. That brought howls of protests from Dean’s Democratic rivals and the charge that Dean was pandering to unreconstructed bigots to get more white votes in his column. A livid Sharpton called Dean a turn coat Democrat and warned that heeding Dean would be a betrayal of black voters. They could have saved their breath. Kerry made only a weak, half-hearted effort to court white male voters in the South. Bush still got nearly seventy percent of the white male vote there, a second sweep of the South and a second term.


A chastised Dean got it right. He simply crunched the numbers and recognized that white males make up more than one-third of the electorate. .

In 2000, exit polling showed that while white women backed Bush over Gore by 3 percentage points, white men backed him by 27 percentage points. Four years later the margin was 26 points for Bush over Kerry among white males.


A huge first red flag waved high for Obama and the Democrats in the recent Ohio Democratic primary that warns that they can’t win without white votes. Clinton won a smash victory over Obama in large part with white votes. And even more ominously, blue collar lower income white voters roundly rejected Obama. In fact, nearly twenty percent of white voters defied political correctness and said that they would not vote for an African-American. That contrasted with national polls, which showed that more than 90 percent of whites said that race would not be a factor in determining their vote. The Ohio mini-white backlash to Obama doesn’t bode well for the Democrats if he’s the eventual nominee. No Republican or Democrat has won the White House in the past four decades without winning Ohio.


Black voters will cheer and dash to the polls en masse for Obama, but their votes won’t be enough to put him in the White House. Despite the myth, they haven’t put any other Democrat candidate in the White House either.

Wednesday, March 12, 2008

Barack Obama Wins Mississippi Primary, Sets His Sights on Beating Clinton in Pennsylvania



By: Michael H. Cottman, BlackAmericaWeb.com, and Associated Press

Presidential candidate Barack Obama easily won the Democratic primary in Mississippi Tuesday with large support from African-American voters, setting the stage for another critical primary against Hillary Clinton in Pennsylvania on Tuesday, April 22.

In the latest in a string of racially polarized presidential contests across the Deep South, Obama was winning roughly 90 percent of the black vote but only about one-quarter of the white vote, extending a pattern that carried him to victory in earlier primaries in South Carolina, Alabama, Georgia and Louisiana.

With 99 percent of the precincts reporting, Obama was leading with 61 percent of the vote, to Clinton’s 37 percent. He leads in the delegate count 1607-1476.

"I am grateful to the people of Mississippi for joining the millions of Americans from every corner of the country who have chosen to turn the page on the failed politics of the past and embrace our movement for change," Obama said in a statement.

Rep. Bennie Thompson, a Democrat from Mississippi who serves as Obama’s state coordinator, said Tuesday black voters in Mississippi were overwhelmingly drawn to Obama’s inspirational message.

"Sen. Obama’s message of hope and change resonates throughout Mississippi," Thompson told BlackAmericaWeb.com Tuesday night. "In a state that has the highest percentage of poverty, the highest infant mortality rates and the lowest literacy rates, people can identify with a candidate who is talking about uplifting people."

Thompson said that Clinton’s continued dismissal of Obama’s victories in smaller states such as Mississippi smacks of a desperate campaign.

"Little victories over time add up to big victories because this is a numbers game," Thompson said.

Thompson, chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, said that the repeated "put downs" by Clinton and her surrogates, like former vice presidential candidate Geraldine Ferraro, only serves to motivate African-Americans to rally around Obama’s candidacy.

Ferraro, who ran for vice president in 1984 and supports Clinton today, started a firestorm of controversy Tuesday by saying, "If Obama was a white man, he would not be in this position," she said, according to an article published in the Daily Breeze. "And if he was a woman of any color he would not be in this position. He happens to be very lucky to be who he is. And the country is caught up in the concept."

And after being roundly criticized by the Clinton campaign, the Obama camp and others, she suggested that she’s taking a pounding because she’s "white."

In an interview from Bolton, Mississippi, Thompson said the Clinton campaign’s criticisms of Obama are offensive for some black Americans because they, too, "have been told at some point that they don’t measure up."

The Clinton campaign continues to attack Obama, Thompson said, "because they have no other place to go."

Ferraro’s comments could not have come at a worse time for the Clinton campaign, and some Democrats say the constant infighting inside the Clinton camp has now turned to race as senior aides are trying to decide whether Clinton should abandon the African-American vote in Pennsylvania.

In the meantime, Democrats say Obama continues to add to his delegate count and multi-state victories.

"He has now won two expected back-to-back wins by impressive margins, which gives him 29 wins to her 14," Peter C. Groff, a Colorado state senator, publisher of Blackpolicy.org and executive director of the Center for African-American Policy at the University of Denver, told BlackAmericaWeb.com Tuesday night.

"In addition, he continues getting overwhelming support from African-Americans while simultaneously pulling in cross-over white voters, something critical for him for the general election should he win the primary," Groff said. "His lead is still solid -- still, his biggest challenge going into Pennsylvania is perception and momentum."

Obama’s triumph seemed unlikely to shorten a Democratic marathon expected to last at least six more weeks -- and possibly far longer -- while Republicans and their nominee-in-waiting, Sen. John McCain, turn their attention to the fall campaign.

"Now we look forward to campaigning in Pennsylvania and around the country," Maggie Williams, Clinton's campaign manager, said in a written statement that congratulated Obama on his win.

"I'm confident that once we get a nominee, the party is going to be unified," Obama said as he collected his victory.

But in a race growing more contentious, he took a swipe at the way his rival's campaign has conducted itself.

"We've been very measured, in terms of how we talk about Sen. Clinton," he said. "I've been careful to say that I think Sen. Clinton is a capable person and that should she win the nomination, obviously, I would support her. I'm not sure we've been getting that same approach from the Clinton campaign," he said on CNN.

Obama won at least 17 delegates, and Clinton won at least 11, with five delegates still to be awarded.

"Sen. Obama's victory in Mississipi has provided his campaign with a powerful psychological boost after his victory in Wyoming just a few days ago," Michelle Bernard, president of the Independent Women’s Voice, told BlackAmericaWeb.com.

"Winning an additional two primaries in the several weeks before the upcoming Pennsylvania primary was important to his campaign and his supporters after losing Ohio, Texas, and Rhode Island to Sen. Clinton," Bernard said. "Now, both of the Democratic contenders will have several weeks to focus on Pennsylvania, honing their message and convincing superdelegates to support their respective candidacies. The candidate who wins the largest number of pledged delegates may stand the greatest chance of winning over undecided superdelegates and wooing the superdelegates of their competitor in the name of party unity."

Neither of the two rivals appears able to win enough delegates through primaries and caucuses to prevail in their historic race for the nomination, a development that has elevated the importance of nearly 800 elected officials and party leaders who will attend next summer's national convention as unelected superdelegates.

Donna Brazile, a Democratic strategist and a superdelegate, said on CNN Tuesday that she felt the majority of the 300-plus super delegates who are "uncommitted" would ultimately agree to support the candidate with the most pledged delegates.

"It seems the Magnolia State has provided Sen. Barack Obama yet another victory -- additional delegates and seemingly a push towards Pennsylvania," Craig Kirby, a Democratic strategist, told BlackAmericaWeb.com. "What's most exciting to me is that from Virginia to Texas and from Utah to Vermont, his message of change continues to resonate with the voters."

Blacks, who have supported Obama in overwhelming numbers in earlier primaries, accounted for roughly half the ballots cast in Mississippi, according to interviews with voters leaving polling places.

About one in six Democratic primary voters were independents, and Clinton and Obama split their support. Another 10 percent of voters were Republican, and they preferred Clinton by a margin of three to one.

Six in 10 Obama supporters said he should pick the former first lady as his vice presidential running mate if he wins the presidential nomination. A smaller share of Clinton's voters, four in 10, said she should place him on the ticket.

The Republican primary provided even less suspense than the Democratic contest. McCain had already amassed enough delegates to win his party's nomination and was in New York, attending an evening fundraiser that was expected to raise $1 million.

Adding to the uncertainty in the lengthening race between Obama and Clinton, Democrats from Florida and Michigan are pressing for their delegations to be seated at the summer convention.

Both states were stripped of their delegates by the Democratic National Committee after they held early primaries in defiance of party rules. Efforts are under way to find a compromise that would satisfy party leaders in both states as well as the candidates, although Obama and his top strategists were cool during the day to proposals for primaries-by-mail.

"I think there are some concerns in terms of making sure that whatever we do is fair and votes are properly counted and the logistics make sense," Obama told CNN.

Obama has defeated Clinton in primaries in South Carolina, Alabama, Georgia and Louisiana, other states where blacks cast a large share of the ballots.

Exit polls showed blacks accounted for a majority of the ballots in all but Louisiana, where they represented a plurality. Obama's share of the black vote in those states ranged from 78 percent in South Carolina to 88 percent in Georgia, while Clinton won the white vote with ease.

After losing 12 straight primaries and caucuses, Clinton rebounded smartly last week with primary victories in Ohio, Texas and Rhode Island. Obama won the Vermont primary, won the Texas caucuses, and suffered a loss of only 11 delegates.

Meanwhile, Groff said Obama has challenges ahead but suggested that his recent success could benefit other Democratic candidates down the road.

"It's highly unlikely that any Democratic nominee would win Wyoming and Mississippi in the general election, but his primary performance in these states suggests that his candidacy could help Democratic state races and contenders, making them competitive in places where they never were," Groff told BlackAmericaWeb.com.

"It also forces Republicans," he said, "to spend money in states they didn't have to defend before."

Monday, March 10, 2008

Sleeping Girl in Clinton Ad Supports Obama



BONNEY LAKE, Wash. - (AP) Casey Knowles didn't much like a recent campaign commercial for Hillary Clinton -- even though she's in it as a sleeping eight-year-old.

After all, she about to turn 18 now and is a big supporter of Barack Obama.

"What I don't like about the ad is its fear-mongering," Knowles told ABC's "Good Morning America Weekend Edition" on Sunday. "I think it's a cheap hit to take. I really prefer Obama's message of looking forward to a bright future."

The well-known Clinton ad aired in Texas before last week's vote and implied a lack of experience on Obama's part. It showed an exterior of a Colonial-style home and old stock footage of Knowles sleeping in bed. A narrator describes a phone ringing in the White House: "It's 3 a.m. and your children are safely asleep. Who do you want answering the phone?"

Clinton won the Texas primary by a 51-47 percent margin.

Knowles said she didn't see the ad until Jon Stewart lampooned it Thursday on "The Daily Show." Her brother noticed it was her, and the family replayed the commercial on their digital recorder to be sure.

"They were parodying this ad, kind of poking fun at it," Knowles said. "My brother was like, 'Is that Casey?' And we just erupted. Sure enough, it's me."

The file footage was originally shot for a railroad company advertisement. The Clinton campaign bought it from Getty Images.

Knowles, a senior at Bonney Lake High School who turns 18 next month, has been campaigning for Obama. She attended his rally at Seattle's KeyArena on Feb. 8. Her mother, Pam, told The News Tribune of Tacoma that Casey cried and trembled after shaking the candidate's hand.

The next day, she was a Democratic precinct captain for the state's caucuses. If she plays her cards right, she could go to the national convention.

Not to mention that she could be in another ad. After her identity became known, Obama's campaign contacted her.

"I mentioned that we should make a counter ad, me and Obama, against Hillary," she said. "They thought that was really funny. They actually might take me up on it."

That said, Knowles said she plans to vote for whichever Democrat wins the nomination.

ANOTHER WIN FOR BARACK: Obama beats Clinton in Wyoming.



Illinois Senator Barack Obama got back on the winning track Saturday by beating New York senator Hillary Clinton in the Wyoming Democratic presidential caucuses.

At EUR press time, Obama had 61 percent of the vote and Clinton had 38 per cent.

In recent days, Clinton campaign officials had downplayed their expectations in the Wyoming caucuses. Obama is obviously resonating with caucus voters; Before Wyoming he won 12 while losing only three.

As far as delegates are concerned, only 12 were up for grabs in Wyoming, but in what has become a tight race, every delegate counts ... a whole lot. Seven delegates will go to Obama and five will go to Clinton. And like primary and caucus elections before it this year, Wyoming election officials say state Democrats turned out in record numbers. In 2004, only 675 people voted in the state caucuses. More than 4,500 had voted Saturday, according to the latest count.

There are 59,000 registered Democrats in the state and on Saturday, one county alone was reporting a turnout of up to 1,000 people.

The big turnout follows campaign stops in the state by the candidates on Friday. Clinton held town-hall meetings and Obama held a rally at the University of Wyoming, along with a townhall meeting in the town of Casper.

As of the start of Saturday's caucuses, Obama held an overall pledged delegate lead of 1,571 to 1,462. Clinton, however, leads in the superdelegate count by 242 to 210. The eventual nominee will need at least 2,025 delegates to win the race.

The next primary takes place on Tuesday in Mississippi where 33 committed or pledged delegates are at stake.